Weber's Three Types of Leadership

Throughout history, there was always a leader. Leadership is important in society, but not all leaders are the same. M. Weber states three different types of leadership: leadership of authoritarianism, democracy, and laissez-faireism. Each of these leaders has its own strengths and weaknesses. Authoritarian leadership is a leader based on the idea of ​​individual control groups. Leaders usually do not say little or no opinion on decision making and focus only on the idea of ​​one person (Cherry 2014).

According to characteristics, the style of leadership is influenced and influenced by personal characteristics and characteristics of leaders. German sociologist Max Weber said three ideals of legitimate political leadership, control and authority, charisma (family and religion), feudal or traditional (patriarchal or patriarchal) and law (modern Law and state). Weber (1947) defines charm as "the specific sanctity of an individual, heroism or model, and the devotion of normative patterns or the order in which he revealed or ordered." He defines the term "charm" as "a certain quality of personal character." With this quality, he is separated from ordinary people and is regarded as supernatural or special power or quality not available to ordinary people. "

An attractive authority is the concept of leadership developed by German sociologist Max Weber. It includes organizations or some type of leadership whose authority derives from the leaders' personal charisma. This is in stark contrast to the other two authorities: legal authority and traditional authority. Each of these three types form part of the authority classification by three of Max Weber. "Charm" is an ancient Greek term that was initially remarkable through a letter to the Christian Community of the first century written by Sao Paulo. In this case, it usually refers to the "gift" of the origin of God, which shows the authority of God in the early leaders of the Church. Max Weber adopted this theological concept and generalized it as an open perspective to treat believers as belonging and to apply it to political science, military, celebrities and non-Christians. Religious competition