Web Evaluation Paper

In this exercise you need to write at least (1000 words) to evaluate the site. It should be written to give a comprehensive overview to the website design, contents and contributions readers.

Your evaluation of the quality of your website should be based on the principles of instruction design you learned on this course and other courses. Please use the following criteria to evaluate your website. You should explain how to apply each of the following criteria to your website, or none of the following criteria apply to this particular website. However, in qualitative evaluation, please avoid creating a list or referring directly to the following list. Additional gauges are used to evaluate the paper. (30 points)

Is the author of the network visible? (Ie speaking something about yourself or including your own photos, sounds, videos, or providing some information about them)

Is there a screen coach? (The on-screen coach, learning agent or educational agent is a screen character that helps guide the learning process during e-learning)

Do you have any practice, practice, questions to answer, or "thinking" on this website?

There are several simulations on this website (eg physical or chemical experiments that can model natural or human systems, or change the variables and conditions and check the results).

The format is user-friendly (clarify the scope, easy to use, easy to use, including links with appropriate marks)

The length is less than 1000 words. Content is acquired mainly by copying, pasting, or speaking from the website. No personal opinion, no evaluation based on instruction design and web design principles

Using your own words, explain the main purpose of the site, author, sponsor, and target audience. Please explain the importance of the website, identity, and contribution. Describe the content of the website, including the main part of the topic or level. Please tell me a brief summary of the website in your own words. I mentioned the principles of web design, but did not actually evaluate based on instruction design and web design principles

It covers all C level standards. In addition, include your personal opinion on the website based on your criteria and / or your criteria related to the needs of a particular type of reader, including your needs. In that evaluation, it covers at least ten web design criteria described in the above description. No detailed comparison with similar website

It covers class B standards. More than 1000 words We will also describe in detail how to implement at least 20 web design standards on web sites using SPECIFIC example. We will compare the website similar to this website in detail to some extent. Make some constructive suggestions on how to improve your website

The process of evaluating a web site is not just to make the page appear "legitimate" by displaying the page. According to the GCU library, the process of evaluating a website includes five categories: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency and coverage (LIBRARY). Each category asks you to understand more deeply the website of your site. I have rated two websites, Womenshealth.com and Childtrends.org. - Quayle's view on why the non-marriage rate goes up His person's perception of social problems and its solution is difficult to warn the public without effective discussion use . Dan Quayle is trying to express an opinion that the situation of society deteriorates to the extent that it departs from the family's values ​​in the speech "Recovery of basic value: strengthening of family".

This page is part of the Multi-Page Evaluation Web Accessibility Resource Kit that outlined various ways to evaluate Web accessibility. This is the second page of 2 page users, including Web projects; to the "Improve access by adding users to Web projects" covering Web design, tool development, standards, and other webs Had a wider range of users at an early stage. Informal assessment of questions about specific accessibility questions can be made by using screen readers with people you know, with other people with disabilities, or with your grandmother, with some data in the initial draft of the data sheet under development It is as simple as looking while looking. Interact and discuss issues