Through the results of the test, you should not judge those with poor grades or those with high scores better than those without grades. Can you distinguish between those who acquired good grades and high scores in the exam and who are smarter than those who do not? I am convinced that it is unfair to judge people who have achieved good results more intelligently than people who did not achieve it. The score of the test is not a fair judgment that distinguishes his intelligence. The score of the test does not show the actual information of the individual.
No test It is not a test what we are doing. As most of us believe that students should not pursue meaninglessly after the score, we also need to consider the idea that students themselves are not scores - we need to take the specialty exam We will not treat it as part of. By doing so, our students lose their human nature and will not evaluate the work we are doing. I chose the picture of Superman at the beginning of this article. Because many teachers think that they should "win" or be a superhero to pass the exam. Teach. For teachers I think that this metaphor is part of why so many teachers leave their jobs or feel disappointed by annoying work. The theme of the super hero is not to strengthen us or to celebrate efforts, but we are putting on the weight of our world (or children).
This is a question worth asking. In the past few decades, the United States (and the world) has relied on standardized tests as a way to broaden its focus and to determine students, teachers and schools from kindergartens to universities. There is no doubt that there is always an important place in the educational system for testing, including standardized tests. But the question to ask is how much you want to evaluate the test and which test and what purpose you need to do.