We should limit students online speech

Thousands of children aggravate the situation without telling them to reliable adults like parents or educators.

Many bullying bullying and students are familiar with schools, communities, and even the enemies from friends.

Russyln Ali said online harassment created a dangerous environment, hindering student education, service, and activities.

Schools should not restrict students' online screenings. Because it violates the first amendment and parents are responsible for limiting their online time. The first amendment stipulates that citizens can express and accept a wide range of opinions and opinions. The aim is to make it possible to exchange opinions freely even if these ideas are unpopular. There are laws stating that if opinions are a direct threat to someone, they lose their freedom. In the absence of a threat that violates the first amendment, we restricted students' online speech and made them illegal.

Despite the rapid increase in student speech on social media and other networks, the Federal Circuit and the State Court have differences in protection level of the first amendment. It is school. Some of the courts, including the courts described in this article, have the discretion and the discretion of the school administrator, just as administrators perceive through speech, as well as statements on campus are punished by Tinker's suspension criteria Some have given authority to give punishment. It is a real threat. However, other courts refused to keep the Tinker standards away from the school environment. School administrators are facing great uncertainty in finding the student's right to speak and appropriate legal standards to maintain order, discipline and most important safety responsibilities.

Reason 2: Schools should restrict teaching breaks by restricting students' freedom of speech. According to the BBC's report, student can lose tuition fee of 38 days for up to one hour or one year due to reduced class interruption time. We should not take time to learn so that children can say whatever they want. Some 45 - year - old adults say they are no longer responsible for what they did, worn or wrote when they were 15 years old. If we insist that freedom of expression and freedom of expression increase as we get older. 14, 15, 16 or 17 Then I will recommend you to the US Congress, the Alabama State Council, and from time to time my column is not necessarily a responsible statement, action, or saint's advice as time passes It serves as evidence to prove that. T-shirt