We Must Accept the Truth About Evironmental Issues

In the mid-1980s, humans used the amazing news that we used certain chemicals (Freon) found in our air conditioners as a propellant for household sprays and the specific industrial processes over the past few decades I knew. With this, more and more vulnerabilities are increasing. Especially protective layer of ozone in the atmosphere in the Earth's Antarctica. Before the ozone hole awakens, many people have never heard of it (ozone is a form of naturally occurring oxygen, there are three molecules, not two molecules), protecting the earth from harmful ultraviolet contamination I do not even know that. Important role B wavelength

Previously, I defined the block chain as a transaction singleton machine with a shared state. Using this definition, the correct current state is found to be a single global truth that everyone must accept. Having multiple states (or chains) destroys the entire system. This is because you can not agree on which state is in the right state. If the chain is branched, there are 10 coins in one chain, 20 coins on the other side and 40 coins on the other side. In this case, we can not judge which chain is the most "effective".

Understanding "accepting the truth" means that you must first see the definition of truth. Today, the truth is seen as a statement mainly telling the story exactly. The situation is what we accept or define as facts. Microsoft Bookshelf is defined as "conforming to facts or reality, not false or error." If you look closely at the word "consistent" you will find that things are not necessarily true or fake. It refers to the proximity of that statement to the fact. Then we have to consider language, state of mind and general facts, the proximity of situation. For example, the sentence "Snow is white" may be accepted as truth. However, from this definition, this sentence only states that the word "snow" represents the natural phenomenon "snow", whereas the word "white" represents the actual white. We notice that language produces marginal error

Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert believes that in order to do the work of separating truth from lies, he must first accept false statements as if it were true. Otherwise, "It is virtually impossible if someone tells us, for example, assuming there is a serious voter fraud in Virginia during the presidential election," Konnikova said It explains to. "The only way we can take the second step is to complete the mental certification process (yes, fraud!) And refuse (what's wrong?