For me, if you operate in the right way, the gun is completely safe. I believe that all gun owners must go through the gun safety course. In the safety course of the gun, we explain to people how to handle the gun correctly, so we will not hurt the people around us. Instructors teach people a number of important ways to use guns. They teach people how to safely take guns, how to switch guns on and off, why not point guns to themselves and someone else, and other important ways. At the moment, according to law, those who wish to hide or open a pistol must take a fire protection course.
Likewise, if we have the right to self defense, we must also have reasonable defense. In other words, we have the right to carry weapons, "weapons" are broad and refer to various ways in which we can rationally protect our lives. As with self-defense rights, the right to possess a weapon must also have the same authority as the right of life. In other words, cost-benefit analysis is not required. Since the purpose of the right to possess weapons is to promote effective self-defense, the relevant question we have to ask in determining the scope of this right is that it is a rational means of self defense It is whether it is eligible or not. Whether some weapons will increase or decrease the average safety is not related to the effectiveness as a means of self-defense. Many people on both sides of gun discussion are missing this important point. Since the value of guns is exactly for their self-defense rights, discussions on gun ownership are focused on self-defense.
The right to hold and carry weapons (often called the right to carry weapons) is the right of those who possess weapons (weapons) for self defense. Only a few countries own weapons, allow them to carry, protect the weapons at the legal level, and a few more countries protect constitutional rights. The Bill of Rights in 1689 stated that Protestant citizens of England "have provided their defenses with weapons that are suitable for their conditions and laws and interfere with the rights of the British royal family to have permanent forces or carry Protestant weapons I will restrict that ". We are armed and are in violation of the law ", not a civil servant, but can decide the parliament and regulate the right to carry weapons
Maria Butina established the organization Right to Bear Arms in Moscow. She also founded a company called Bridges LLC with former NRA president Paul Ericsson. Since 2012 the right to carry weapons with the National Rifle Association has jointly influenced US gun control policy and a year later David Keane offered support to the Alexander Torsin to the National Rifle Association. The American Rifle Association, a powerful gun movement organization, waited for four days before announcing statements about the tragedy, but robbed the lives of 20 children and six adults issued by Right Tor Bear Arms in Moscow It was. I hear a noise. Time posted an announcement calling for an increase in the right to acquire weapons on their website