WashU Expert: NFL protests are free speech, but not protected by First Amendment

Greg Magallian, a law expert at the University of Washington in St. Louis, said the protests by NFL players in recent national anthems are not protected by the first revision.

Magallian shared his thoughts on the recent controversy caused by a September 22 speech followed by President Donald Trump's tweet.

In short, employers like the NFL team can imagine such public protests in the national anthem trying to stop their employees, players. But if it is not a public demand, the citizens expect that people will have access to this opportunity.

"The NFL player 's protest over the national anthem reminds us that the first amendment applies only to government actions as a legal requirement, private employees are subject to constitutional According to contract terms and trade union contracts, the team can take action against players.

"But freedom of speech is not merely a legal guarantee - it is social value - I care whether our speech and the speech of the people we want to hear are suppressed by the government, not private litigation There is no need to respect the protest action of the NFL team, but if deterring the protest action, many people will feel as follows: I am not happy.

All of us should pay attention so that the President abuses power, violates the constitution or punishes what he does not like.

"Public-private relations have ceased both ways, we are putting pressure on our employers to allow protest actions so that the Constitution does not interfere with private employer's obstruction of protest actions.

"That's why it is very worrying that Mr. Donald Trump is opposed to the protests of NFL, Mr. Trump as president talks about what he wants and criticizes those who want it He pressed the pressure on punishing other people's speech (such as the national anthem protest of the NFL player), he violated the first amendment. "

Do you think the President is willing to join NFL 's protest, or the protest he opposes? This is an important issue

"So far, the declaration of the playing card does not seem to clearly exceed the boundary from publicity to compulsion, but since the president has more power than anyone, he said he Forced punishment of a statement that he does not want to guarantee that the President will not abuse his power and not violate the Constitution "

The first amendment prohibits the government from restricting freedom of speech. As a private company, NFL is not bound by the same standard. If the NFL requests players to sign a contract to restrict freedom of expression and players violate their contracts, they may be dismissed with little or no legal means. When talking about dismissal prayers, Frankford is talking about Joseph Kennedy, an assistant coach at Bremerton High School in Bremerton, Washington. Kennedy was practicing the leadership team's prayers during school football games. When the annual review arrived, Kennedy's contract said that he was "not complying with the regional policy" and "could not supervise the post-match student athlete due to interaction with the media and (community) community" It was not updated due to reason

The first revision of the US Constitution will protect the freedom of speech, religion, and press. It also protects the right to peaceful protests and petitions the government. This amendment was passed in 1791 with the other nine fixes. These amendments constitute a written document protecting the civil liberties under the Bill of Rights - US law. Over the years, the meaning of the first amendment has been ongoing interpretation and controversy. The groundbreaking case of the Supreme Court involves claiming the right for the United States to be involved in an external war and burning the flag and publishing confidential documents.

An important form of political speech is protest. The first amendment will protect protests, news, meetings and petitions. James Madison who wrote the Bill of Rights bolstered public debate about political topics. He wants the public to be able to talk about laws and policies. He believes that the United States should ensure that the United States should allow their political concerns to be freely expressed through peaceful arguments. If this right is not guaranteed, they may rely on violent protests.