Was the Reign of Terror in France justified?

Domination of terror has come from the era of political turmoil and conflict. European coronation banks fight against revolutionary France, the French citizens are increasingly patriotic and they need to keep "their" revolution in order to cope with the threat of imminent foreign invasion I believe.

When people decide to accept foreign enemies, they always look for internal enemies. In addition to fighting the armies of Austria and Prussia, the revolutionaries also made a bloody and intense confrontation with domestic anti-revolutionists trying to regain the ancient regime. The military is on the verge of failure and the revolutionaries fully believe that the abolished monarch and his followers are cooperating with foreign forces to destroy the revolution at once. The existence of a new armed state is threatened

There is no doubt, but in the environment of allegiance and paranoia, powerful people are hoping to force terrorists to rule their enemies. Hopeless measures is required at desperate moments

However, at the same time, terrorism has no doubt as an ideological superiority as a revolutionary tactic. Leading revolutionaries like Robespierre have publicly proved that terrorism is used not only for practical reasons but also for moral reasons. The obsession of Robespie against the purity of the revolution has been threatened by opponents both inside and outside. Virtue is the concept of domination at peace time, but it must be related to the persistent use of terrorism during conflict. Since Robespierre considers himself the most friendly person among revolutionaries, he believes in nature that he and the other Jacobins party are responsible for the release of terrorist activities in France.

The terror rule cast in the war was finally canceled by it. Because the French Revolutionary Army succeeded in defeating the anti-revolutionary army of a foreign country, it became more difficult to defend large-scale repression. But, if any, Robespierre will further increase fear. In the process, he alienated many former comrades who were concerned that they would be the next guillotine. Extreme revolutionaries exaggerated their hands and their destiny was sealed.

Whatever its reason, there is no doubt that the rule of terrorism has caused great suffering. Thousands of people lost their lives. The majority of people killed as in the legend are not traitors of aristocrats and intrigues, but ordinary men and women often die only with minimal evidence.

It saved France, it worked, and other countries thus created the world today, so terror domination is justified. By violence, the world will look like this. So the rule of terrorism is immoral. It killed a lot of French but brought France to the power of Europe. It helped to change France, which helped to change the world, which created the world we live in. "Men are afraid of death as children are afraid of darkness" - Bacon

Four years after the French Revolution began, France entered the famous "time of fear" where more than 16,000 people were executed in doubt against the revolution. The rule of terror started when the Public Safety Commission took over the third National Congress that was enacted since the beginning of the French Revolution. The following timetable lists government and major reforms.

White Terror: The era of political violence in the French Revolutionary period after the end of Robespierre's death and terror rule. It was started by a group in Southern France who called themselves "Jehu's companion." They are planning to make a double uprising in line with the invasion of Western Austria and East Austria. Domination of terrorists: During the period of violence during the French Revolution, two hostile political factions, the collision of Jylond and Jacobin, and the massive execution of the "enemy of the revolution" became prominent. The death toll has reached tens of thousands. 16,594 of which were executed by guillotine and 25,000 more executed in France.