Was Stalin a "Great Man"?

Thoman Carlyle believes that 'great men' are those who shape history and influence future development. In the case of the Soviet dictator Joseph Stalin from 1929 to 1953, one could feel that he was able to modernize the country through torture and savage forces and to suppress his own race. It can be said that Stalin is a great leader of the 20th century. After all, he occupied an undeveloped country and formed it as one of the world's largest industries and military strength. However, the cost of this shift is not high.

Joseph Stalin was a great man; most other people in the 20th century did not approach him. He is very simple, calm and courageous. He rarely loses the balance; he slowly thinks about his problem, makes a clear and firm decision, to succumbing to show off, to keep his dignity occupying his legal status Even shyly unavoidable. He is the son of a calf, but hesitantly neither hesitant nor nervous, quietly stands in front of an adult. But - this is also the greatest evidence of his greatness - he knows ordinary people, he feels his problem and obeys his fate

Joseph Stalin was an ambitious person who played an important role in the transformation of Russia, after the death of the 20th century and the death of 1953. Joseph Stalin is a cold blooded leader who can evoke revolutionary loyalty among believers. According to Stalin's power Nikita Khrushchev expressed Stalin's guidance as "creation of personality worship". What gave Stalin a power? Is it because he can persuade people on behalf of him? With the rise of industrialization, does it hold power? Or did he just create a cult? The success of Stalin may be brought about by three combinations. However, it can not be denied that Stalin's leadership played an important role in the present Russian depiction. In the 1930 's he brought Russia to the era of industry but changed the people of the Soviet to a country with a modern and strong will that can fight the Western countries.

In December 1936, Stalin announced the new Soviet constitution. Although the Constitution was seen as a personal victory for Stalin, at this time Stalin was explained by Pravda as "a new world genius, the wisest person of the era, the great leader of Communism". By contrast historians from the western historians and from the countries occupied by the former Soviet Union considered the constitution a meaningless propaganda. In the late 1930's, people turned their attention to the axes. In 1939, almost a year after the "Munich Agreement" between the United Kingdom and France and Germany, the Soviet Union addressed the Nazis issue both militarily and economically during extensive negotiations. In August 1939, the two countries signed the "Molotov · Ribbindroop Convention" and "Death Business Agreement". The non - invasive treaty allowed the occupation of the Soviet of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia, Bessarabia, North Bukovina and Eastern Poland.