War or Peace?

If you think about war and then think about peace, that is really bad. Without war, there is basically no human life. Because nobody has genuine items. War is certainly not a good thing, but without a lot of wars, not all of them are bad. A successful war for a peaceful transition was the Guatemalan War of 1960-1996, because they live in a peaceful country today, but considerable progress has been made. An example of a failed war turned to peace was the civil war in 1991 in Somalia, which is still in progress today.

"War is peaceful" is one example. In order to explain that "war is peace", we must see the word "preserve peace." America as a liberator of the world has a bad habit of maintaining peace abroad. This really means that they are threatening to send troops to these lands equipped with state-of-the-art weapons and kill all those who violate democratic interests. All of these are the name of "keep peace". Double thinking behaviors are now becoming common in the world, and many young people are ripped to believe in contradictory statements about politics and life.

It can be said that "war is the subject of peace". Is not it so? Because the war has not fundamentally opposed the development of human values, just because the head of state has declared there is no future war just because there is not enough resources to continue large scale expansion It is not. A small time when the empire and the state drew revenge was called "peace". Returning to the present, Aleppo's annoying confusion resulted from the murder of the rebel army against the Asad regime and ultimately the defeat of the Islamic state. The people are adopted to counter the "threat" defined by the people. Maybe, but how realistic is that? Does Saddam Hussein really have weapons of mass destruction as claimed by George Bush and all the West, or are the threats threatening to restore the west side?

George W Bush and Tony Blair sent them to the 2003 Iraq war when they claimed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction, they each lied. Technically, Prime Minister Blair "distorted" the information to ensure that the Iraq war was approved, but what is the difference again? What happened next? Because it is our new reality, everyone has gone, including the media. We are in a state of war and not due to Iraq and Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction, but due to the increase in global terrorism, there are few ways to improve. Some people. Hussein is a perfect villain. The media covered the war and we consumed it. It is not a simple complementary problem, this is the same war that created ISIS. Too reality, too complicated. change the world