Walking in Formation Makes Men Feel More Powerful

From ancient Greeks to modern riot police, people entered "fighting" and despite arguing against the invasion of the Persian army, even though they dominated the protest actions, they carried out units side by side and their legs did not move It was. For outsiders, this formation represents a powerful aura, a unified, coherent and powerful appearance. For people moving in formation, it does something similar: it makes their enemies feel smaller and weaker. Two psychologists can even suggest even making this unit more vulnerable to attack.

According to a new survey, one experiment is that men who are in sync with others are "stronger than men who imagine a person claiming to be a criminal is not synchronized with the task" I am talking. Based on concrete survey results, scientists believe that this is more likely to make people more active.

The University of California stated in the article on this study that this idea is significantly related to recent events in Ferguson, Missouri. When using military grade equipment, the police SWAT team gained a lot of attention. But SWAT is an acronym for "Special weapons and tactics". "If the police do what they do on a daily basis, UCLA asked, would a simple act of unanimous march would increase the chances of the police exercising excessive force on protest action?"

In their experiments, researchers walked with one of 96 undergraduate students at the University of California Los Angeles campus. Sometimes they walk synchronously, sometimes they just walk casually. According to the University of California, Los Angeles, young people walking in synchrony tend to judge perceived threats are weaker than normal pedestrians. According to a recent study by the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), people who feel strongly tend to be more active.

There is a clear warning about how to apply to the military and riot police now. Undergraduates are not skilled SWAT teams. Suddenly when wearing combat clothes, assault rifles, riot police and wearing as a heavy armored human wall, the police may feel stronger, they are more than those directly supported by research We assume it will become active. They may feel stronger, but in theory training can reduce the increase in attack trend

Or, because we are only guessing, a standing formation may reduce aggression. If the other party is not intimidating so much, the policeman with heavy armor will be crazy and will not do foolish things.

In addition to speculation, this study is increasingly adding evidence of people's perception of risk changes based on their own behavior - for example recent research suggests that people with guns are

I believe that people can risk taking risks. For example, people who prepare power, whether female or male, are more likely to have sex without a condom. Power also increases the likelihood that people will violate the rules, for example by manipulating the evidence to achieve the goal. Researchers throw two rolls to get two two lottery tickets to people to throw a set of dice and determine the number of lottery tickets they will receive and invite their crap We urged people to report. People who are activating are more likely to overestimate their scores. Finally, power turns people into hypocrites. There is a high possibility that a powerful person is likely to cheat, but it is also highly likely to condemn others from fraud or other forms of moral failure.

The theory is like this. Men are buyers on the market and women are sellers. A male bid. The more they have a mixture of money, muscle and strength, they are more competitive. They are more valuable than beautiful, neat, blond and fertile women. Men buy, women sell. But what does the man buy? They are not just buying sex. They are in love with the "hottest" woman. I noticed it now. The only party with the agent is male. Women are reduced to resources, goods, and of course. She is not subjective, there is no reality, no inner nature. But this man is also decreasing - his wallet, muscle, and position are shrinking. It is not a moral, moral, emotional or social institution, it is just a physical and financial institution. But are these two people - is this a bit shrinking? Is this theory correct in some way?