Voting in our Two Party System

Since its establishment, the United States has acted as a constitutional democratic country. The authority to approve the government is not only guaranteed but also enacted by the US Constitution which requires political participation of all qualified citizens. Free elections and voting are an important part of our political structure and our most important right. Our country is bipartisan, which is questionable as these parties have all political power; these elections are really free. The parties changed the name and ideology over time, but the election, in particular the presidential election, concentrated in these two groups.

There is a strong argument that our voting system strengthens the two party system: the first come, first serve system makes people hate voting for candidates who think they might be lost. I do not mind voting for third party candidates. I think this is a good idea and I will support that. Nobody wants to feel that their vote is wasted. There are five different two-party systems in the United States. There are always two main parties, but these parties change over time, retreat, flow, come and go. Many people will use this as proof that we are the system of both parties, but I think that we are in a multi-party state during all transition from one bipartisan to another bipartisan I told you there was. In 1860, 1982, 1912, 1924, 1948, 1968, there was a third party agency to win in more than one state. In 1992 there was a powerful third party competitor. This is 12% of our election. Not so good, but not so

Thanks to our two-party system and the first vote of the past, third-party candidates rarely vote in elections. In 1992, German candidate Rospero received a very impressive 19% vote, but could not win the state. In 1968, apartheid George Wallace won 46 electoral votes in five southern states. That year, he only won 13.5% of the referendum, but he won the election vote for support in the depths of the south.