Vote yes on Prop. 10 — allowing local rent control is a matter of racial justice

People who disagree with Proposition No. 10, a local rent management initiative voted in November, may say that rental management is a difficult problem of free market. However, the housing crisis in California is not difficult. This is a racial justice problem, simple and straightforward.

Voters should pass the 10th proposal to abolish the province's Costa Rica - Hawkins rental housing bill and begin dealing with inequality in ethnic-only homes. Proposition No. 10 expands the power of local governments to impose rental restrictions on housing

Caucasian in America is a property owner for decades and people in history are forced to rent a house. When the Federal Housing Plan established the rating system to correlate the availability of mortgage with competition in the 1930s, Red Lining made the mortgage in the "unwelcome" area of ​​the city where the bank has more color people I began to prevent approval. From 1934 to 1962, the federal government supported 120 billion dollar housing loans. 98% of them were for white families. Private lenders use these government guidelines to reject mortgage loans or to charge higher interest rates and fees

This is not the old days. My white grandparents borrowed a mortgage. By purchasing real estate, they can get the cornerstone of laying family wealth in that country, but Californians do not. We will continue to build white wealth at the expense of color people by allowing the landlord to continue raising California rent without restrictions.

Today, most of California African Americans and Latino Americans are lessors, nearly 63% of whites are residential owners of California, 34% of African Americans and 42.3% of Hispanic houses. main

In order to allow communities to pass through rent management, we need to pass proposal 10. It does not preclude serious racial differences in our house, but that is the beginning. Just because they are Caucasian, I do not want my son to live in a world that benefits them. And it makes California more difficult to survive. Supporting support 10 is a very important part of it.

Mr. Fulton of Los Altos runs a company called Bold Food. It teaches cooking science, and planning a food based tour. She has a neuroscience background and has been involved in biotechnology supply chain business for 15 years. She is a member of San Jose 's racial justice

Vote for suggestion 10 for the law that would allow cities that need to pass through rent increases. In Proposition No. 10, rental management is not stipulated. It does not force the community to take rental management measures that are not suited to the situation of your residence. It does not force any versatile solution for every city. On the other hand, in Proposition No. 10, only communities suffering from soaring house prices can limit how much rent they can raise each year. The community can freely increase the assets of the house and ensure that the landlord gets a reasonable annual revenue while the lessor prevents a significant increase in rent

Recommendation No. 10 gives local governments the ability to create and expand solutions to keep people at home. Whether the community strengthens the protection of rental restrictions depends on the degree of the housing crisis in the region, but it is necessary to choose to formulate the policy that is most suitable for residents. Urban resident nationwide needs to be able to take action as soon as the family is at home. Nationwide urban rental regulations and community stabilization regulations are exactly that. Adoption of Proposition No. 10 means that more families will benefit from the protection of rent in single-family homes and apartments.

Listen to advertisement No. 10 on the controversial rent management measures in California - you think that this is a serious flaw that will deepen the state housing crisis more deeply. If you click "Yes" at ten points, you will have a Californian lessee who urgently needs this action. Their argument is that some landlords will find another use of the rental property if it is the upper limit of profits. In a survey of October 2017 by the economist at Stanford University Business School, San Francisco owner converted the apartment to rent apartment, even after the city was expanded in 1994, the entire building was destroyed and restrained .