Virginia V. Sebelius

In the past few decades medical care is an institution that the US needs but has problems. In particular, private companies are the main reason for high premiums and refuse to recognize previous patients. In order to solve these problems, Congress and President Obama signed Patient Protection and Price Medical Act (PPACA). PPACA is a federal state that focuses on reform of the private health insurance market, provides better insurance for people in existing circumstances and improves health insurance situation.

The court's opinion may differ depending on whether unpurchased insurance is regarded as an economic activity affecting interstate trade. In the case of Virginia versus Sibelius, judge Henry Hudson insisted that not purchasing health insurance can not be regarded as economic activity, but argued that it was "inactive" economically and overturned the law. Free University v. In the case of Geithner, judge Norman Moon objected to the law and by choosing to abandon insurance far removed from "inactive", the plaintiff is not going to pay for medical expenses at his own expense instead of his own expenses It makes a decisive decision. Now, by buying insurance. Likewise, in the lawsuit against Thomas Moore Law Center v. Obama, Judge George Steel adjudged that these decisions "will have documentary influence on interstate transactions".

Recently, in 2012 NFIB v. Sebelius Healthcare Incident, most judges thought that permission to force medical insurance for economic activity exceeded the authority of the Department of Commerce. And necessary and appropriate terms. "We can not maintain the power to exercise Congress under commercial terms," ​​Supreme Court Secretary Roberts wrote. Furthermore, if an individual considers the insurance reform of the bill to be "necessary", expanding the authority of the Federal Government is not an "appropriate" means to make these reforms effective. On the other hand, Chief Justice Roberts proposed five votes to maintain 'Affordable Medical Law' by adopting "savings structure" Fines against the enforcement of insurance provisions are not mandatory, but commercial reserves It can be regarded as tax rather than money.