Violent Video Games and Minors

In today's video game world, children can change feelings using realistic graphics as a "role-playing" of murderers, murderers, gangsters, car thieves, or any other role-playing. These games reward the murder and encourage violent crime. Under the current law, retailers are not obliged to impose restrictions on sale of video games by minors. Currently, a 10-year-old child can purchase an adult-only (AO level) video game.

Licensing to sell high-rated video games only to adults does not affect the profit and the ability of the industry to pursue "art" among adult consumers. Parents need to be part of the decision-making process, including the products that children can use to learn, beautification and organization of the most basic norms that make up graphics, extreme violence, and human dignity there is. If you face the science to prove that children play violent video games, it can cause irrevocable damage.

PTC urges legislators to comply with the law, enforce the ESRB evaluation guidelines, and purchase games subject to penalties for violating laws

Social scientists have argued that for more than 50 years there is the possibility of bringing a child's attack by touching violent media products. The US military used a simulator similar to a first person shooter game to make soldiers sensitive to violence and prepared for mental killing. (See research)

April 2006 - The federal court dismissed Michigan's law that parents are obliged to agree to children who purchase violent video games. They will sue.

February 2006 - Kansas became the sixth state to introduce the law in 2006. Indeed, so far so many states have enacted laws in all court rulings as violating similar laws.

December 2005 - Senate (Clinton, Lieberman, and Bayh) proposed a bill stipulating that it is illegal to lend or sell minor or adult-only games to minors.

Respondents representing the video game and software industry raised the California law enforcement dispute to restrict the sale or rent of violent video games to minors. The Federal District Court concluded that this measure violated the First Amendment and prohibited its execution forever. The ninth tour is certain. (A) Video games are subject to First Amendment protection. Like protected books, theaters, and movies, they communicate ideas through familiar literary equipment and media-specific functions. And "Basic principle of freedom of spee ... ... It will not change with new media or different media" Joseph Burstin v. Wilson, 343, US 495

This lawsuit examines whether the right to freedom of expression of the first amendment protects the sale of violent video games to minors, if so, if violent video games are minors To physical and mental hazards before being restricted to sale to the public. Violent video game for minors. Governor California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger ("California") states that the state can be adequately available for adults, but what can be harmful to children can be limited, so the first amendment is violence against minors It does not apply to sales of video game. California further states that if the first amendment applies, the court must comply with the state's ruling, so the state is a direct cause of violent video games and minor physical and psychological harm I do not need to indicate relationships. Between video game and minor's aggressive behavior