Violence Will Never Bring Victory Over Terrorism

Since September 11, 2001, violence never brings victory to terrorism. In the spirit of anger, hate spreads to hostility. This hostility must concentrate on something or someone else. Howard Thurman pointed out in his book "Growth Edge" that "If hostility can not express anything else, it is like a boomerang and looks at its owner." Respond to death and destruction caused by terrorist attacks.

"Violence only provides a temporary victory and violence will never bring about permanent peace by creating more social problems than to settle" (King 482). These are wise words that Dr. Martin Luther King said during him as a civil rights activist. Unfortunately, in today's world this principle seems to have been completely forgotten, violence only brings more violence. This principle applies to the current problem of today's interrogator torturing the terrorists.

When we deal with daily violence, there is often confusion between violence and terrorism. In her essay "About Violence", Arendt differentiates the form of violence from fear. Arendt wrote that terrorism is "unlike violence, on the contrary, if violence destroys all power and does not give up, on the contrary, following full control, the form of the government will be destroyed." The difference in the ability of communication and understanding to weaken the space between us and us. When it is still in power, only when violence completes this job successfully it will produce bad quality. The distinction between terrorism and violence by Arendt also applies in the 20th century, but it shows a useful definition of terrorism and violence today.

The self-destructive element in the victory of violence against power is more evident than the use of terrorism to maintain control. Unlike violence, terrorism destroys all power without abandoning violence, but the form of the government is still completely controlled. It is often noted that the effectiveness of terrorism depends almost entirely on the degree of social atomization and that the disappearance of various systematic opposition must be achieved before the full exercise of terrorist forces. This atomization - an incredibly pale, academically suggested thing - the fear it means - eventually led to the loss of complete power