Violence of Decolonization

Frantz Fanon, who is not colonized, thinks that colonization must always be a violent phenomenon, since it is not feasible to use politics alone to resist colonial authority . Europeans have proved that colonization is justified by dealing with it as a work of God. They believe that God wants to occupy all the land and spread the word of God to the wilderness of darker skin. When Algeria was colonized in French, French participated in Algerian nationalist movement. Many of the violent examples written in "The tragic world of the earth" come from the struggle of Algeria for independence.

Frantz Fanon considers that violence is necessary in the case of any colonial release in order to enable "indigenous peoples" to successfully settle settlers. I argue that there is no need for violence and that there are other ways to deal with colonization problems. Using Mahatma Gandhi's article on "About Satyagraha" you will be able to see other options for violence. First let's see that Fanon's view of violence is necessary. First, Fanon said that cancellation of colonization is always a violent phenomenon. The first thing he said is that it is always "violent" and no other way of violence under any circumstances. He also said that people born and raised were always ready for violence. This is for suppression to the extent that the locals have to deal with. Fanon seems to believe that something like colonization that began with violence must end with the end of violence and colonization.

Philosopher and psychiatrist Frantz Omar Fanon wrote an era of independence from oppressors in colonies like Algeria and highlighted the importance of violence in the process of colonization. Since colonialism weakens colonial status both physically and mentally, we believe that only the fierce agitation of the colonial rule can allow suppressed groups to gain their identity.

The main similarity between the withdrawal of the British non-colonization model and the French non-colonization integration model is that both methods are trying to give colony liberty with minimal violence. The gradual withdrawal method adopted by the UK is aimed at ensuring a smooth transition between British colonial rule and the newly released government. This approach seeks to prevent disorder and confusion in new countries formed after the colonial release by ensuring that new governments have sufficient self-management capabilities. The integrated approach adopted by the French government also ensures a smooth transition by maintaining that France will influence the various activities of the newly formed government.