Violence is never the answer

This is very popular in America. We would like to tell the children that violence is unacceptable and teach them a better dispute resolution strategy. Please use your words, not fists.

For Baltimore's riot, this seems to be a general attitude. When the police car was burned down, the moderator of cable television was deceived and accused street violence meaningless and savage. As they chose to express their own violent ways, any point Baltimore's inhabitants tried to create was lost.

But will the focus of violence be lost? I know that it is easier to face Baltimore. Those people were very angry, so they lost their collective ideas and set fire on something. What do you mean?

When they really take time to understand what really truly is a fundamental factor - the despair people feel from the oppressive system they see, they abandoned them long ago - it began to make a little sense It was. It may not be right, but at least it's easy to understand. As Michael Fletcher wrote in the Washington Post editorial, "The explosion of Baltimore is only a matter of time."

Now I am not trying to understand the factors of socio-economic and social justice in this situation, but I will say that the riots are meaningless and intelligent injustice. It is more complicated than the lawless lawless thugs. The meaning is derived from it. Should mobs be praised? of course not. But should we try to learn from them? I agree

Let's ask yourself a question first. To be honest, as a country, do we really believe that violence is never a solution? It does not always look so clear. I think that most people agree that violence is necessary. Remember, tea entering Boston Harbor is the cause of the American revolution and is not a hard letter.

In some cases, it seems that you are using violence as a passport. The SWAT team may break the door and throw the flash bomb while destroying drug dealers. We do not care about that. Because we believe that using violence guarantees our safety.

In some cases, we decided that violence is acceptable, but when people who have lost their feet get frustrated, this is shocking.

Regardless of whether you like it or not, that protest action that night saw violence as the best sound pulling our attention. Is there a more civilized way to hear this voice? of course. But, unless they have set up CVS, do you really think you know the name of Freddy Gray?

Perhaps we should not treat Baltimore's violence as meaningless but treat it as a symptom of a larger fundamental problem such as poverty, racial discrimination, despair. So, if we all worked hard to solve these problems, perhaps we would not see so many violent incidents.

Earlier today, I read an article on the Colorado Independence Paper and quoted JoAnn Windholz, Adams County Councilor. "Although violence is by no means the answer, we must start pointing out who is the real culprit.Violence can cause violence, so family planning: you will be violent in your wall "Abortion and family plan are always controversial, so the legality of abortion is still problematic. It's not. Repeat. It's not. As with the right to use weapons, women 's choice is protected by the Constitution. The constitutional scope offered by Roe v. Wade's ruling (described in this article) is as follows.

When is speech violence? There will never be an answer. Audio may be annoying, but it does not become violent. Words may be ugly or dislike, but this does not make it violent. Words may be related to harmful physiological effects and even injuries, but they still do not make them violent. Speech may even threaten or threaten violence. This is illegal, but it does not become violence. Equivalent speech and violence make it possible not only to deprive ourselves of our own understanding, but also to become competent civilians who can defeat bad ideas with better ideas. "Self" "Defense" For psychologists who claim that violence is not only wrong, it is harmful.