Aleph's story collection as a general theme tends to use more physical violence. Whether it is execution, sword fighting, political killing, or revenge, many of these stories are lean, masculine and cold traditions. Especially the story that pulled my attention was "dead". On the surface, this is a simpler story of typical Borges fashion, unexpected endings, fast tempo, violence, we have the relationship between the title and the hero's fate revealed I understand that.
According to Cogis, initially there was no order in the universe. In order to organize such confusion, to create the universe, and to avoid returning to the original universal disorder to end the world, he must respect and respect the laws that must be handed down to man through the "language" of nature It is the mother of the world that made it clear. As we have seen, nature itself is a unit and the group of living beings are interconnected through relationships and communication fixed by a global mother. All ordered and classified. In particular, there are two ways to see nature's things; each one is not only what people see but also things that you can grasp with a sense, and that is the alumina "spirit" that gives true value It contains. It "animates" it, in a sense it is "genius". In this way, Universal Mother talks to people, showing how he should handle nature, the law he must respect and the duty to fulfill about nature.
Is the human nature what is it order and government, or chaotic and disorderly? A general question is whether this is good or bad for men. According to William Golding, human nature has flaws, it is corrupt and is basically bad. In his book "The Lord of the Flies", Golding clearly shows his belief in social humanity. Although Lord of the Flies may seem like a story about some children accidentally destroyed on the island, Golding is writing it more. Golding established the perfect situation to test humanity of humanity. Through many examples, he shows clearly to his readers how he feels about human nature.
Why is social order more than chaos and violence? There are lots of answers to this question. Through routineization and rule searching, it may be our evolutionary nature to ask for some cooperation and some degree of daily predictability. Proverbs of ancient anthropology as human beings of homosexuality (human beings are wolves for human beings) may not be true. At the same time, however, humans are not always friendly with each other, and we also know that people from different groups do not necessarily get along. How can a large number of people making up a national society actually maintain stable citizenship relations?