Views on Gay Marriage in Anna Quindlin’s Essay Evan’s Two Moms

This article "Evan's Two Moms" was written by Anna Quindlin and published in "Good Reason for Contemporary Discussion" published in 2004. This article takes a liberal view of gay marriage and the ability to raise children among homosexual families. Among all Quindlen articles, her structure introduces spirit, sorrow, and signature through various lawsuits to gain readers' trust; she is aware that through the passion against them and the fluctuation strength of the reader A person who has a fundamental view on marriage of homosexuals.

These views can be made from the perspective of Ana - Blay 's response to the legalization of gay marriages, the case study of Prime Minister Queensland. In an article in the Brisbane era, Anna Brais called a gay marriage "human rights". He calls equality of marriage the "issue of fundamental human rights and equity" (Brisbane Times, the second paragraph of 2011). Likewise, Anna Bligh's response to the issue of legalization of homosexual marriages is reaffirmed by Nagel's view that prohibiting gay marriage is a discriminatory situation. Anna Bry, who says not legalizing homosexual marriages is equality and infringement of human rights, only presents her own views. Her overall response suggests that homosexual couples should have the same rights as heterosexual couples in society. Homosexual couples should be allowed to marry, have equal human rights, nurture children, be accepted in society.

Gay marriage is nothing new, historical evidence suggests that marriage is not necessarily a system between heterosexuals. Same sexual marriage existed in some form about 600 years ago. (Tulchin, 2007) Since the early 1960s homosexual activists have fought for the right to marry. However, the problem of gay marriage only occurred in the 1990s. Because the three equal sex couples forbid gay marriage to the state of Hawaii. In this lawsuit, it was concluded that the ban on gay marriage is not constitutional, because there is no substantial practical reason or persuasive discussion. (Bauer, 2010)

Strong opposition to homosexual marriage is the central theme of Louis P. Sheldon's 'unnatural' homosexual marriage. According to the author, homosexual marriage is "unnatural", contrary to the nature of marriage. At the same time, it violates America's social values ​​and its standards. In explaining his view, the author points out that according to a poll, "gay marriage" was rejected by major Americans. Especially since gay marriage lacks reproductive ability, we think that same-sex marriage is incompatible both culturally and physically, for which reason a third party must participate, which infringes the essence of marriage . To maintain his view, the authors claim that judges do not care about the wishes and values ​​of the majority of the community. Instead, homosexuals begin to gain more special rights from judicial tyranny in the United States.