Victorian Values on Sex and Sexuality

James Joyce set a portrait of an artist as a young man during the Victorian era. Josephine Butler's moral dual criteria and Elizabeth Lee 's sexuality and sexuality Victoria theory make us a deeper understanding of the sex and sex recognition of people in the Victorian era. I think that sex is an inevitable part of life. Sex is the "ultimate goal of men and women" (Lee). Victorian people think that they depend on gender, "the essence of good and evil depends on ..." (Lee). This means you do not know how you are exposed or you are not aware how your sexual behavior is considered good or evil.

According to each field and reproductive system, the consistent definition of women's role by men and society can be seen in today's Victorian "strange" value. First of all, we are not talking about gender at all. Girls can grow until they become women but still do not know where the children came from: "The body of a woman is hidden in a long, wide clothing as mysterious as a man ..." All sex and related things were inconsistent with the concept of certified purity and were severely despised. Doctors believe that masturbation leads to "a certain mental disorder, epilepsy and female hysteria" (Perkin 22)

Foucault initially compared our current "Victorian regime" with the sexual behavior dominated in the 17th century, then compared it with a previously opened system. This deliberate Victorian morning considers sex as "restraint" and "hypocrisy". This shows all sexual activity outside the bedroom of a married heterosexual couple featuring breeding, silence, and monogamous. Other sexual acts are carried out by suppressing 'brothels' or mental hospitals. They are given "sentences to disappear", "prohibition of silence", "confirmation that they do not exist". Only in the fields they will allow, they are given "... real shape rights". "Discourse of secret, limit, and coding type". Therefore, Foucault proposed the nature of his analysis: the history of discussion, excellence, oppression, the relationship between power and knowledge