Value Pluralism and Absolute Moral Judgments

Extensive and deep moral differences continue to resist reasonable solutions and enable ongoing discussion on the validity of moral judgments. In this article, we will explain whether moral judgment is correct or incorrect in an absolute or relative sense based on the diversity of moral judgment and the disagreement of strong opinion. This article will defend the pluralism that if there is no specific universal value, there is at least one person's minimum value.

Moral pluralism is also known as "value" or "moral" pluralism. It is related to the concept of moral relativism (there are many moral theories, there are no objective criteria to judge them) but they are not identical. background)

Value pluralism believes that there is a possibility that two or more moral values ​​are equal (true), but there is a contradiction. Furthermore, in many cases, we assume that this incompatible value may be reasonably unboundable. Therefore, value pluralism is a theory in meta ethics, not an ethical theory or a series of values ​​itself. Oxford historian Isaiah Berlin recognized the first substantial research on value pluralism and gathered attention in general academic circles. Verification is a cognitive truth theory based on the idea that ideas will participate in specific activities. Verificationism's own argument, by definition, is that the result of such verification is reliability. In other words, facts can be simplified to this verification process. What is important is the theory that "the power of living" is active in living beings, so life can not be described solely by mechanisms.

Moral pluralism (also called value pluralism) is a theory about the value of human pursuit or the essence of matter, whose pursuit constitutes the essence of their moral life. The simplest moral pluralism believes that the values ​​or products pursued legally by a human being are pluralistic, incompatible and irresponsible. In other words, there are lots of real human values ​​that can not be attributed to a single rewrite of value or value system. This is because certain human values ​​are inherently contrary to other equally valid human values. For example, individual freedom may be inconsistent with equality, public order or technical efficiency, justice and compassion and gentleness, scientific truthfulness of public utility, and public interest.