Using Full Body Scanners: Is That Really Necessary?

Since the terrorist attack on September 11, 2001, many countries recognized the importance of this serious security problem, began fighting against terrorism, actively cooperating against terrorism to strengthen national security We are starting to join. Scientists have developed high-performance support technologies and research. At the airport, we use some basic safety equipment to check passenger dangerous goods. Full body scanner is a typical example of airport security check showing the latest airport security technology.

Airport Security Full Body Scanner: The airport's full body scanner (the device that creates the body image) obviously does not affect your pacemaker, but amazingly, there is no objective evidence of this problem. For details of whole body scanner and pacemaker, please see here. MRI Scan: The MRI scanner may interrupt the pacing function of the pacemaker; in some cases it may actually damage the device. The MRI problem can be avoided by paying special attention during MRI processing and restricting certain types of MRI scans. If you have a pacemaker and need MRI, you should carefully discuss risks and benefits with your doctor.

Does airport security violate passenger privacy? Is a full body scanner necessary? How about pat? Is personal concern about privacy and radiation exposure more than safety? Or are they the precautions that passengers need to cooperate? If you are the head of the TSA, how do you find the balance between these issues? Please join the discussion and tell me what you think.

TSA is experimenting with a US $ 170,000 full body scanner using millimeter wave technology at about 20 airports in the United States. Essentially, these scanners present rough but identifiable images of passenger nude pictures to TSA filters in different rooms. At the moment, TSA is blurring the passenger's face, but the genitalia and chest are not blurred. The older backscattering technique revealed in 2003 actually reveals more details of the body and is very realistic, but it has not been used yet. Currently, the scanner is used instead of tapping the TSA randomly or in response to passengers triggering the metal detector multiple times. However, since this technology was first introduced in Phoenix Airport, Arizona in 2007, privacy advocates have opposed it. They believe this is a clear infringement of individual privacy.