Using Four Arguments to Have Full Knowledge - Plato’s Cave and the Divided Lines

Plato's cave, use the following four arguments to get enough knowledge - the boundaries that people have to learn the value of life, realize their dreams and realize the difference in dreams . As the father of Western philosophy, Plato and Plato's cave suggest boundaries, to show the difference between the world and the wisdom of people living in a visible world, the visible world has its own reflection and shadow In the world, there is about the wisdom of the world, so thinking and thinking.

When Plato's cave fables and division lines compare together, they form Plato's belief about how real-world knowledge and map things are understood. The four stages of departure from a person's cave correspond to the four parts of the parting line. The first guess is to see the shadow of the object in front of him on the wall when a person is left in the cave. The second belief is the part when a person leaves the cave and starts to look around the object.

Wait a moment ... "Cave"? I think this is dubious for Plato familiar people. Plato's theory of the Republic is divided into four levels: the reality, the image and the fable of the cave divider line: We are like a prisoner trapped in the cave floor. However, usually you can not see the cave itself - you can only see the shadow on the wall. Therefore, Neo is a prisoner restrained to see the shadow of the matrix. However, if Plato 's prisoner is released, he can stand up and see the surroundings. He looked at the cave, watching the back burning fire, so you can now know that he was revered in reality that fire was expelled by a flame in front of a parade doll cast. Plato did not say who was marching these dolls. Neo learned that it is a computer with perception. For this reason, he saw the embarrassment of his operation. Originally it was hard to believe, but the depth of revelation made him uncomfortable!