Use and Misuse of Science

In the president's speech, Professor JC Ear posted a part of "use and abuse of science" at the Royal Society of New South Wales State, but this part has been reprinted from "Journal of Journal" and "Conference Record" I will. It involves only knowing in some cases that a known natural phenomenon occurs, but it also has the ability to schedule the stage so that it occurs at the time and place we do. Knowledge may be power, but it has no effect until we attempt to consciously use it. We can use our power constructively or destructively, but we can not underestimate this responsibility. Our actions have to be decided by some kind of motivation and moral problems are inevitable. In arguing about the use of science, Earl ties research to utilization rather than expansion of knowledge, secondary scientific research, and the latter focuses on expanding knowledge compared to primary science. The latter believes that he will promote other obligations to maintain the cultural tradition, liberating the basic responsibility of the university. He argues that it is dangerous to use existing resources to promote secondary research rather than primary research at universities in Australia, the latter claim requires more energy support both inside and outside. Professor Earle did not suggest that secondary scientific research is less important, and he mentioned the Australian scientific research needs of Australian products, while promoting greater and stronger interest in basic research.

The focus of this white paper is the discussion of the use and misuse of logic in science, and the "real world" of our experience. In the process of science mathematics has a special place. Mathematics as a subset of logic (and vice versa) do not know anything about the real world. It is our modeling tool for natural knowledge, which provides our model and our measurement and observation. Logical relationship between them. . Without logic / mathematics, the science that we know is incredible. There is no other way to integrate real-world knowledge into a unified and useful system.

In my opinion, science is a tragedy as many people use technology and they do not know how to use it. They are misusing science and technology. That is why so many people face problems. The new technology of scientific inventors was that they were technologies that were harmful to humans at the time, before scientific products reflected radiation. Mobile, TV, cooler AC, computer. That is why science is a problem of trouble. Science is like a real god, yes, that has drawbacks as well. Let's explain alternately the good and bad effects of science on human life. Prior to this, when medicine was underdeveloped, many people lost their lives with syndrome due to complete diagnosis and lack of effective medication. Medicine is very well developed today, and this result shows a decrease in mortality rate.

The abuse of science has brought many bad factors to our lives. People's beliefs about turf and religion are eroded. Morality and morality were left behind, materialism increased unprecedentedly. Rapid and unplanned indiscriminate industrialization resulted in extensive pollution. There is no doubt that science and technology have made major advances in recent years, but human life has lost humanity at the same rate. Human values ​​are pushed to the background and people become more selfish, cruel, emotional, violent and destructive. There is no simple life or advanced thinking. But let's hope that the ultimate rationality will become universal and that science will be increasingly used for the benefit of mankind. It depends entirely on how humans use science and their discovery and research. Science as knowledge and power is neither a savior nor a destroyer

The full paper of "Science - blessings and curses" is the 10th graders, the 12th graders and the graduation class.