US Should Side with Ethiopica in Egypt vs. Ethiopia Conflict

Introduction: Stakeholders: the international community, the local people, the interests of the US Purpose of this article: The purpose of this article is to explain the influence and consequences of the war between Egypt and Ethiopia, and the influence on their territory and the fight against terrorism It is to inform. In June 2006, Egyptian politicians announced a series of malicious acts by the dam construction project at Blue Nile in Ethiopia during the video conference (Stack, 2013). This threat to Ethiopia may weaken the unstable political stability of the Nile Valley countries.

Last year, between Egypt and the Ethiopian government there was a clash between hydroelectric power and the Renaissance dam of Ethiopia. These two countries are almost 100% dependent on fresh water from the Nile. The river is a matter of "life and death" of Egypt and Ethiopia, and as a result of concern about redistribution of water resources, these countries began to settle the conflict with the help of independent political parties. The agreement was made taking into consideration common interests. Construction of HPP will continue

Posner and Sykes provide an essential nature of the conflict between Ethiopia and Egypt and an economic framework that will help to better understand the legal and non-legal barriers to achieving reciprocal satisfactory results. Starting with a series of simple assumptions, you can begin to see the more traditional theoretical method challenges of international law in attempting to resolve conflicts. Let us first assume that Ethiopia and Egypt are reasonable countries to pursue profits for their world without a central enforcement mechanism. Both Ethiopia and Egypt understand that there is no world government or world police to enforce international law - perhaps creating opportunities to ignore the rules of international law -