US Open organisers to review communication policies in wake of Serena Williams umpire controversy

The US Tennis Association (USTA) said on Sunday he will review its communication policy after a series of dismissal disputes at the US Open.

Swedish referee Muhammad Layani was accused when descended from the chair by the organizer of the US Open and gave Pierre Haggs Herbert and Nick Kyrgios a midfielder in the second round.

Referee Chris Criss deleted her shirt in court after noticing that she returned to French player Alice Connett.

On Saturday, Serena Williams received three penalty kicks in the second game against bold Naomi, causing a violent argument.

USTA spokesperson Chris Widmayr says, "

"These events will urge us to analyze the way we will undertake certain changes, of course we do not want contradiction.

The Women's Tennis Association (WTA) expressed disappointment with the Williams and Osaka games on Sunday

Steve Simon, CEO of WTA, says: "[WTA] promises to cooperate with sports so that all players receive the same treatment, I do not believe this was done last night."

He also sought coach permission, which Williams is one of the offenses admitting violations, which is the subject of the USTA program review.

Because USTA's Widmaier stated that it is extremely hot and humid, authorities have introduced heating regulations for men and women and can lead to confusion

"Things related to Alize Cornet are caused by fever, but it also brings everything that I have never seen before," Widmaier said. "This urged us to say," Hey, we might not be here. " "

Executive director of International Tennis Performance Association, Mark Kovacs said the controversy over this year's tournament "attracted attention in the field of sports that should be addressed in the future."

"Clearly, the application of the rules needs to be consistent," Kovacs said. "At this time, the referee has sufficient discretion and the same crime does not suffer the same punishment over and over again."

On Sunday, CoCo Vandeweghe and Ashleigh Barty told reporters, after winning the girls' doubles final, the authorities denied the opportunity to talk with the crowd as the authorities did not want a delay in the men's single final, so there is even more controversy Stated.

Follow independent sports on Instagram, and learn about all the best images, videos and stories from the sports world.

Unfortunately, the 2018 US Open Women's Final between Serena Williams and Naomi Osaka was controversial. There are many opinions about what happened in the court and its fairness. Is this a chairman referee beyond his limit? Or maybe this could be an irritated player to keep her feelings away from her because of disappointment. Perhaps there are two involved. Anyway, let's examine this event from another perspective - this is a psychological resilience lens

After Serena Williams is planning to join the technology entrepreneur Alexis Ohanian, the founder of Williams 'husband, Redditch this year's US Open Women's Final, Williams' husband, after a conflict conflict with the referee, Williams I will keep losing the game. Video to social media. "Make sure she sees it!" He wrote, as if he were another fan of worship rather than a person who shared his life with Williams, what he wants is I can show him whatever. There were still times when Williams wanted Italian cuisine, so the Ohan took them to Venice (of course, put this smooth movement on Instagram). These behaviors are objective and romantic, but in reality they feel romcom directly, but in reality Ohanian is also a tennis spouse and has a strange performance image Justin Trudeau

When cartoonist Mark Knight writes Serena Adams and Referee Carlos Ramos in his US Open Final who wrote his manga, he said, "I claim that book and respond to the public's criticism of racial discrimination, sex and person It is irrelevant to seeds. "According to Herald Sun of Melbourne. In many cases, people who have seen multiple episodes of a friend think that they are not doing racial discrimination or gender discrimination because they do not plan to do so. In their view, they identified the racial discrimination with hatred and sexism intentionally by ignoring women. Therefore, if there is no clear marginalization or harm in something, it is not racist or sexist according to the definition.