US Involvement in Libya and Syria

According to UN resolution No. 1973 of 2011, 1973, the United States participated in the Libya strike to protect citizens and said that all actions will allow citizens to be protected from Gaddafi regime. At the same time Syria's riots began with the civil war of the Assad regime, insisted more lives and seemed to use chemical weapons against civilians, but the United States and the United Nations made little action. Due to the increasingly complex situation between Syria and the United States it is more difficult to take decisive action than to attack in Libya.

America was involved in Syria for certain reasons. This is very similar to their involvement / invasion to Libya and Iraq. There is no humanitarian on their agenda. This is not an agenda for bringing democracy and liberty to the cruel dictatorship of the Middle East. Syria completed a triangular relationship including Iraq and Libya. Petroleum, natural gas (Syria), regional and political control are all. Asad was repeatedly accused of using chemical weapons against his own people. Revolt groups (usually supported by the US) can obtain chemical weapons. The West has always argued that there is evidence against Assad, but they have never shown it. The United States insists on concrete evidence that Saddam Hussein possesses weapons of mass destruction. This evidence has never been published. Assad is not an angel. He is responsible for human rights abuses, but is he excessively a demon?

Failure of the human rights system has put the Western side in a difficult position. Like the Balkans and Rwanda in the 1990s, Iraq in the 2000s, Libya, Sudan, Syria, when the violation became undignibly obvious, the West ignored them and face the option of breaking their commitment to human rights doing. We also started military intervention in violation of peaceful efforts to resolve conflict. The United Nations Security Council is the only way to get rid of this dilemma and has its own legal authority to overcome the war with countries that do not fulfill human rights obligations.

Iraq, Libya, Syria ... After catastrophic external intervention, the countries were torn by sectarianism and political violence. US invasion and occupation to Iraq, NATO interference to Libya and Syrian international organization war. Just by mentioning these countries, the image of sectarian-led atrocities and social collapse will turn into the abyss of the Hobbes Jungle. Now, as long as it is supposed to be, this is commonplace. People are listening to lazy logic everywhere in public discourse. "But they always hate each other ..." or "Violence and conflict are peculiar to the area." However, it is not always the case - I could not find a place to coexist with Syria, beautiful, peaceful. But the Syrians themselves will never forget