"Urban transformation - a problem of disguise" Introduction According to Ronald Kelden, author of "Global System and Policy Response in Population and Urban Change," urban change is a society where the majority of the population is concentrated in urban areas. Transition The transformation of a city is one of the phenomena that has both a positive effect and a negative effect of development. Urban change can have a positive impact on the country by enhancing economic growth and reducing poverty.
Before continuing to evaluate Hovrath's assumptions on the transition from fixed capital to working capital (or stray capital or nomadic capital) it is important to point out that this change signifies the decline of urbanization and urban culture. Compared with the rulers of Aksumite and Zagwe, King Amhara was unable to patronize the construction of secular and spiritual buildings and other arts and crafts. The remarkable exception is the revival of literature, which is related to the development of the monastery and the order of the religion. In addition to the work of philosopher Zaraya Yaqob (1433-68), most literature mainly includes royal records and the Bible. It was around the end of the 16th century that the wanderers began to replace their tents with stone houses. This is a habit related to the arrival and settlement of hundreds of Portuguese.
At the beginning of the 21st century, half of the world's population lived in the area classified as city. This is a political and military big impact, especially since Asia and Africa have only started to transform the city. Institutions and politics that provide services to relatively fragmented and stable rural populations in the 20th century are not necessarily successfully transferred to cities and as a result new tensions and conflicts often arise. The expansion of the inequality between the North and the South makes the tension even worse. Recent actions by Grozny, Mostar, Ramallah are not unusual