Untitled Document

The doctor advises the child to consume 23 to 34 grams of sugar a day. One average can of soda contains about 40 grams of sugar. Large size can exceed 100 grams! But does the government need to limit the size of the candied drink? Let's see what Henry and Ashley said.

The government needs to limit the size of the candied drink. Overeating sugar may lead to obesity. In addition, excess sugar may have an adverse effect on our teeth and mind. In many cases, you will complete a large sweet soda without noticing that the soda can exceeds recommended daily sugar volume. The government can improve public health by limiting the size of candied drinks. Finally, sugar does not have important nutrients.

The government should not limit the size of candied drinks. The government can help public health by improving hospitals and medical care. It is not government's job to decide people's consumption. Citizens and companies should decide the size of drinks. In addition, people often share a big drink bottle with others. Sharing a big bottle is cheaper, easier, and more environmentally suitable.

If people eat less sugar, people who have health problems such as obesity and tooth decay will be less. Limiting the size of candied drinks is a good way to prevent health problems. In addition, to share a large bottle of beverages, you usually need to purchase additional paper cups. This is also expensive and harmful to the environment. My teacher agrees me that the government should limit the size of the candied drink.

It is the responsibility of the individual to manage the intake of sugar. For the children it is the responsibility of the parents to ensure that the children do not drink too much sweet drink. Just because the government limits the size of candied drink does not guarantee people will eat less sugar. It is a better idea to teach children to teach nutrition and make healthy choices at school.

Ashley is the winner today. Henry committed a logical mistake called authority. This paradox occurred when the debate talked about the opinion of an authoritative figure such as Henry's teacher. If you want to include them in their arguments, be sure to include the reason why authority figures have this opinion.

I do not remember when it was, but last summer I decided to have a productive writing day that starts with an untitled sky text file and ends with hundreds of black curves. Once a perfect, distracting, formidable white spot. My friends Chris and I decided not to write a novel but a series of essays and stories. It manages in some way. Indeed, it fell without any obstacle. I am going to give advice on how to write a book in the summer, but I do not have it: we just do it. I have never thought of writing a book, I want to write

I think the greatest fear is still and still a blank paper, a blank paper, not a text file. If I write it, I should share too much ... then I thought about what I was running, sharing, communicating and discussing with other people Many ideas about what you can do. I went directly to blogger mode and resumed old notes, new ideas, technical ideas, movies, music, and life. Every day, if 100 or 100 people reading my blog are not important, I feel I am at the top of the world. Losing fear of this writing leads to finding ways to delve deeper into the same topic.

Well, before declaring a big victory, we must admit that we are considering four open documents when writing this article. But before the crash, it was still "Untitled 24". This clarity may not be that wonderful, but our new pace is more civilized, our working space becomes clearer and our processing speed becomes more free.