This content is available through online browsing (free) program dependent on page scan. Screen readers can not currently scan, so please contact JSTOR user support for access. We will provide PDF copy of your screen reader
Prison culture has a complex system of sexual behavior. Sexual violence under certain circumstances may have different interpretation under different circumstances. Its interpretation depends on the pre-attack behavior of the victim and the attacker, and on the recognition of other prisoners about the cause of sexual violence. Due to the sexual culture of prisoners, prisoners can object to the meaning of sexual violence under similar circumstances. Some prisoners may interpret sexual violence as rape, but other prisoners may interpret similar behavior as non-rape. The response of the victim to the attacker after sexual violence plays an important role in interpreting the prisoner's sexual violence.
Student behavior depends greatly on general social attitudes and cultural and social norms of behavior. Understanding the university's sexual violence is important in the context of social relations. Contrary to the myth of rapes by strangers, the proportion of friends and acquaintances who sexually attack women on college campus ranges from 80% to 90%. As a result of this survey, only a few male students on campus committed most of the sexual violence at school, not discovered and shown to be a criminal (Lisak & Miller, 2002). Acceptance and acceptance of more serious, more severe sex criminal acts in campus culture
Sexual norms can be personal or social norms, which are rules enforced by society. The norm affects various human behavior. Most cultures have social norms on sexual behavior. For example, most cultural norms include married behavior among heterosexuals. Sexual norms are constantly changing, normal sexual behavior is a category that can not be strictly defined. Deviations from normal sexual behavior are common and can be categorized in several ways. If non-limiting sexual norms are considered positive, they may be called "sexual liberty", "sexual liberation", or "freedom of love". If they are considered negative, they may be called "sexual permission" or "adultery." Restricted actions that are judged to be negative are called "sexual oppression" and, if affirmed, they are called "virginity", "sexual restraint", "maritime effect" or "sexual violence". Western European countries tend to treat continuous homosexuality as a normal heterosexual lifestyle