Unbounded Systems Thinking

Introduction The nature of the questions that we are required to do in homework requires "unlimited system thought" as the mode of the most appropriate question. It is a matter of "soft" or "chaos" to adjust the actual pressure in the IS design, predict the next five years, and predict the progress of IS / IT. Since the chaos problem is inherently human, it is necessary to solve the solution creatively. Active system (HAS). The multifaceted concept of Churchy's philosophy called Unlimited System Thinking (UST) or Ian Mitrov's "How to Understand the Fifth" or "Singerian IS" is about using more than one in a survey. Outlook

George J. Klir argues that "classification is not perfect, it applies to all purposes," and the system is applied to abstract, real and conceptual physical systems, bounded systems and bounded systems, continuous systems from discrete systems , Pulse-hybrid system, etc. The system and its environment are classified as relatively closed system and open system. Absolutely closed system seems to be unlikely to exist, but there is a possibility that it is known to humans if it exists. Between the hard system (the technical nature and method applicable to system engineering, operations research, quantitative system analysis) and the soft system including persons and organizations (usually related to the concept developed by Peter Checkland and Brian Wilson) There are also important differences. Behavioral research by soft system methodology (SSM) and methodology including participatory design

Soft system methodology Similar to the idea of ​​social technology system, software system methodology (SSM) seems to promote system engineering (CHECKLAND) as a countermeasure to the so-called "more difficult" technical point of view. Emphasis is placed on the need to have multiple perspectives on the value and usefulness of technology systems, depending on the user, user manager, or technology developer's perspective. For example, SSM encourages the development of technical contexts that are most suitable for a particular technology. It is said that it is somewhat "manager's methodology" and does not cope with the political power relationship in the design and implementation of new technology appropriately (PAIN ET AL.) As a concrete framework for conceptualization of system analysis (CHECKLAND). Coles)