U.S. ratification of UNCLOS will not be detrimental

So far, this drama is ironic. Criticisms against these political rights do not capture the real threat to US maritime interests This is a major issue in the coastal nation's most intimate allies, including non-governmental organizations (NGOs) like Greenpeace and Canada and Australia It is a ruthless move. For environmental reasons we will unilaterally implement maritime regulations that limit the international transport of sea and aircraft at sea. Former US ambassador to the United Nations Ambassador John Bolton expressed a partnership with the government that likes the same as NGOs as "norms", among which "civil society" is the most politicized We combined a free government with effort. Benefit of the United States Many of the most advanced maritime rules born from this process are protection of the treaty that the submarine depends on to ensure that the submarine passes the obstruction point of the world and can initiate military operations from a "maritime" ship It is inconsistent with the freedom of navigation that was done. In coastal areas of the world. Similarly, countries with less goodwill such as North Korea, China, Iran and others have tried to dominate the ocean beyond 200 miles by setting safe zones. Both types of coastal country regulations are trying to block American ships and aircraft's large ships, so risking the national security that thrived the US economy and unilaterally using the world's commons in coastal countries I have denied.

Opponents also are reluctant to mention unanimous support of the affected US industry. In order to economically oppose the treaty, the opponents demand that the oil, gas, shipping, fishing, shipbuilding, export and telecommunications industries do not understand their revenue. Opponents need to say that this diversified industry is lobbying for money and time to express results that do not contribute to their own interests.

The vast majority of conservative Republicans are working on common measures to expand the capacity of US oil and gas companies to strengthen the naval rights to explore resources in new areas and to give exclusive economic sovereignty to the United States It is expected to support. The economic sphere ranges from our coast to 200 miles and our fishery industry creates employment and helps reduce the likelihood of successful application of Russia to the Arctic. All the consequences of these conservative support will come from the ratification of the Convention on the Law of the Seas of the United States. However, the treaty was blocked due to short-term conservative issues that led to discomfort to multilateralism.

By ratifying the United Nations Code of Convention, the United States can truly provide US companies with support and competitive advantage that they have enthusiastically supported over the past 30 years. Stability and predictability provided by the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 218 To prevent US employment from being lost to the UK and other countries, the United States has been working to help US companies establish deep-sea mining It is necessary to participate in the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Create employment in a potentially advantageous emerging industry. 219

Ratification of the United Nations Maritime Treaty by the Congress will help to secure US interests in the Asia Pacific region and will reaffirm the principles of freedom of navigation in international waters and airspace in accordance with international law. Considering changing waters there may not be so important actions, but we must protect and protect US interests and regional values ​​through these waters. Rule base order - peace

Due to the implementation of US foreign policy and national security activities, well-known "relocation to Asia", the force of the Pacific region, diplomacy and politics were at the forefront of discussion. I sincerely support the US Senate ratification of the United Nations Convention on the Sea Law (the UN Convention on the Sea Law), an important part of our focus on the Pacific. This treaty is essential to the national security interests of the United States and political and economic interests in Asia. It provides the legality of the rule of law, in our actions, especially controversial areas. Retired US Coast Guard Captain Robert Papp briefly stated that "the legitimacy of the position as a sovereign state and the position as the world leader depends on the rule of law."