U.S. Policy Response to Japanese Claims over the Islands

In the security field in particular, Japan is regarded as an important foreign policy partner from the United States (Chanlett-Avery, 2013). As a strong alliance, the two countries closely cooperate to contain emerging countries. This also means that despite Washington taking a neutral position against the archipelago, re-establishment of the commitment under Article 5 of the Treaty on Mutual Cooperation and Security (Jiji Press English News Service, 2012) It is because confirmation is still being forced.

In Japan, the San Francisco Peace Treaty supported Japan 's assertion of the sovereignty of the Diaoyu Islands / Senkaku Islands and was used to prove that Japan supports the current international order led by the United States. In February 2013, the Abe administration established the "Territory-sovereignty policy planning adjustment office". Within a year from the establishment, the office launched a website to explain and prove Japanese sovereignty against Diaoyu / Secret Islands and the sovereign requirements of Dokdo / Take Island and Northern Territory / 1000 Islands. This site emphasizes "the Senkaku Islands are unquestionably historical facts, it is an essential part of Japanese territory in relation to international law", multilingual posters, videos, brochures There are dozens of projects to include. , Focus has been added))

► Japan is an island country with nearly 7,000 islands, including 421 secluded (small) islands. ► There are two types of development invoices on remote islands in Japan. ► For a long time, remote islands in Japan have been viewed as a necessary condition to eliminate recession. ► The Japanese government's remote island policy has shifted from development to environmental protection

Historically, the United States just encountered British invasion during the war of 1812. (There were other small invasions in Mexico in the 19th century.The attack on Pearl Harbor, two remote islands that occupied Japan on Aleutian Islands during World War II, was not an invasion but a raid. Do not worry too much - this is the work of domestic police and intelligence agencies, not military work. However, up to 54% of the federal discretionary discretionary expenditure is spent on the Pentagon. The Bush administration "waged a war in Afghanistan and Iraq outside the budget of the Department of Defense." This does not include the interest on debt or the benefits paid for the old war. We pay annual $ 5 billion to World War II. We are still paying for the beneficiaries of the civil war and the Spanish-American war!