Types of Leadership: Autocratic Leadership

According to General Manager of Robbins, Bergman, Stagg, and Coulter (2012, p. 606), Edwards of 6 Steps & Rising adopted an authoritarian leadership style. The Institute of University of Iowa has decided that authoritarian leaders are leaders who centralize authority, control work methods and processes, make independent decisions, and limit employee engagement and feedback (Robbins et al., 2012). When Albert forbid the transfer request to another office of the CEO, prohibits the independent decision by Teresa to propose the creative process proposed and making restrictive decisions, he is authoritarian Practice leadership style.

Therefore, we know that the basic categories of leadership are in fact / potential, more formal / informal, and there are three types of leadership: 1) authoritarian leadership (authoritarian style) . Expectations; 2) Participatory Leadership (Democracy Style) - This style is usually most effective. Democratic leaders not only provide guidance to the group, but also allow other members to participate in the group and provide opinions. 3) Delegation (Laissez-Fair style) - This type of leadership thinks the efficiency is low with the above method.

There are various kinds of leadership theory in this world. Naturalistic theory, functional leadership theory, contextual leadership theory, authoritarianism, participation in leadership theory, trading and change leadership theory, the last is moral leadership. This article explains the definition of ethical leadership and its function. Moral or ethical leadership is a leadership style that requires guys to be a leader to lead, show the way and fulfill accountability to other members. Moral leadership has a very different type from any other leadership style. The goal is not to obey them, but to serve their leaders. Ethical leaders are not proud of their skills, they tend to increase their skills.

There are three styles of leadership. The first style of leadership is an authoritarian style. According to Awan (2010, pp. 253 - 266), authoritarian leaders made independent decisions to rule over other team members "to achieve a single goal". The second style is democratic. This style of leadership encourages and enables team members to apply based on what is relevant to work, but team leaders always make final decisions (Robbins 2011, pp. 297-299). The third style of leadership is Laissez-Faire style. According to Van (2004, pp. 1-13), the leader of Laissez-Faire Style can not manage the members of the organization, so the organization can decide completely and freely.