Two Ideas: Both Wrong, Both Right

When I grow up, I am a fan of superheroes. On weekends I spend infinite time on brave animation that is fascinated by television and fighting their enemies to save humanity. I am attracted not only by their strength and perseverance but also their overwhelming wisdom. Somehow, they always rescue the victim in time and make the right decision to return the world to its original peace. In retrospect, you can easily understand why superheroes are not genuine. These programs definitely gave me continuous pleasure, but they also made me fall into a trap of having one correct answer and one wrong answer in each confrontation .

In the words of the great economist John Maynard Keynes, "the views of economists and political philosophers are stronger than generally understood, regardless of whether they are right or wrong. They think that they do not fully receive the influence of intelligence, usually an economist's slave that no longer exists. "

There is an epistemology that there is shallow discussion and shallow discussion on all important ideas, and they are all incorrect. There is also a deep discussion about arguments against oppression. They are okay. Or at least all of them contain the truth, but these may seem small and painful, but now it is confusing. When the best elements of deep discussion are contrasted, coordinated and integrated, the world moves forward. When we take a high standpoint, we will deeply discuss ourselves, but we will attack the other party's shallow arguments. That is why political discussions are not resonating in most cases. We begin to believe that our opponents are holding a shallow version of their position, which means they are trivial, or stupid, or evil. There are some of them, but they are not the most

I think you are right and right, as you said that you and Gates are right. I would like to try to come up with two my useless ideas, my two coins, limited ones on the wrong side; hopefully this will make me appreciate your article teach. I think you can forgive my poor English. Whether we are a product of nature, whether it is the highest level or the lowest level - I truly believe that we are fewer than other creatures and can not get any more. We got the planet and sunshine, basically it's all. This makes us the most fortunate (or just lucky) thing, but did you think about the reasons? Extinction of at least three large species followed by unprecedented evolutionary expansion

The only two examples of the coexistence of both parties are if both opposing parties are neutral, if they both have sufficient resources, or if the two conflicting aspects are inherently correct or incorrect When conflicting forces that occupy the same niche and solve the same problem lack resources abundantly, or when they are in contact with each other, the other party is always eliminated by the opponent.