Twelve Angry Men and the Jurors of The Kevorkian Trials

"I can not become a person, I want to die," said Sherry Miller, a patient at Dr. Jack Kevorkian of the famous "Destructor" (Chermak 107). The right to commit suicide did not become a problem until Dr. Jack Kevorkian challenged. Kevorkian was born in Chermak 101, Michigan in 1928. When his mother died of cancer his interest in death began. Kevorkian hopes to find a simpler way to help people achieve the desire to die; therefore his solution is a suicide machine (Chermak 103).

Hero or villain. Fierce or gentle. Jack Kevorkian's jury, "Suicide Doctor", the trial must answer this question (Morganthau). Kevorkian attempted suicide with the help of Thomas Youk. The jury must decide to declare Kevorkian responsible for Youk 's death, to make Youk responsible for his own destiny, or to find a compromise between them. At Regina de Rose 's play "Twelve Angry Men", contradictory jurors must also make difficult murder decisions as well. - In the drama "12 angry people", the boy is being tried as being killed after a night of quarrel. The 25 - year - old Rodney King was beaten by four Caucasian Los Angeles police officers (CNN wire 1) on March 3, 1991. On this day, the drunkard exceeded the speed limit, so the king was pulled apart (Kaplan 1). The jury of both cases played an important role in the judgment of each case.

As a jury in any trial it is difficult to draw conclusions from twelve different opinions. The imaginary drama "12 angry people" proves this is the truth, but the jury of the Sandusky trial found it relatively easy to make a judgment. Jerry Sandusky, an associate professor at Penn State University of Pennsylvania and a founder of second mile charity, was convicted of child abuse. - Guilty or not guilty? This is an important issue for young people who are accused of having killed a father in a murder trial. Twelve "Angry Men" by Reginald Rose introduced audiences to 12 jurors of various backgrounds. One of the most important elements of the play is how their individuality and experience influenced the guilty votes of their first majority. The three most influential members include jury # 3, jury # 10, and jury # 11.