Turkish Letters

In the Turkish style, Ogier de Busbecq wrote articles on Ottoman society women. He talked about the laws and requirements of Turkish women / wives. The Turks are known as "the most cautious people in the world, my wife is modest." In this society, I think that the humility of the wife will not be compromised even if it hides in the place silently, but when they appeared, they had to take them to the street in an abnormal situation, "They sent So they were wrapped in a veil and wrapped, they seem to be the gliding ghost just met them. "After marriage their wives can not go beyond their limits .

I would like to analyze several Western European accounts of the Ottoman Empire from the Turkish expression written by Ogier Ghiselin de Busbecq who described the Ottoman Empire with a series of letters written between the Austrian Empire, Ambassador of Ferdinand I is. From 1554 to 1562, from the Roman Empire to the Ottoman Empire. This article includes three areas of particular interest to me: Turkish Army, lack of openness or borrowing of other cultures by Turks, and analysis of Christian slavery. Busbecq shows the record of the Ottoman Empire that attracts witnesses from the standpoint of a well-educated Western observer, in the "magnificent" of Sultan Suleiman, the largest ruler of the Ottoman Empire. In that letter, Busbecq explains some of the work and details of the Turkish army, including interesting information about "Janissaries".

In 1990, psychologist Robert Jay Leifton received a letter from Nuzhet Kandemir of the Turkish embassy asking that he mentioned the mention of Armenian genocide in a book. This ambassador mistakenly included a draft of the letter written by scholar Heath W. Lowry. In 1996, Lori was appointed Chairman of Princeton University. And it was funded by the Turkish government and caused a discussion about scholarship ethics.

The Armenian slaughter is a historical event and the official Turkish opinion is unacceptable. Many Turkish institutions, especially political institutions and bureaucracies, are not going to be responsible for this historic event. The official view of Turkey has caused some arguments about Armenian massacre. Prior to the establishment of the Republic of Turkey, the massacre of Armenia was not denied. - In the early stages of World War I, members of the Armenian race began to deal with the racial prejudices from the Turks, which quickly led to genocide. The term genocide means deliberate destruction of nationality or ethnicity. As part of the Ottoman Empire in 1915, Turkey set the goal of eliminating prominent Armenians and taking the initiative to destroy enemies forever.