Tu Quoque (Logical Fallacy) - Definition and Examples

Advertising homosexual claim that a person charges his or her plaintiffs: logical error. It is also known as the error of "you are also", "two mistakes", or "see who is talking"

"It is clear that an answer to a complaint can not deny a claim, please consider the following points.

Walter: Hey, wait a moment. You cheated on your income tax last year. Or have you forgotten?

Walter's counterclaim may be right, but this does not mean Wilma's claim is wrong. "

"Recently, we emphasized the story of a British journalist about the incredible rise of Dubai, some people in Dubai including writers who wanted to remind Britain about their country called for a foul Is one fifth of the population in poverty? "(Dubai's Rebuttal", "New York Times", 15 April 2009)

"When a person blames others in false or inconsistent ways, this paradox happens to avoid taking other people's position seriously.

In this example, my daughter made qu qu's mistake. She dismissed her mother 's claim as she thought the mother talked in the wrong way.

According to a wider sentence, the 'tu quoque arguments' or 'you also' argument can answer the speaker's argument using any type of argument, ie the speaker can use a specific type If you pass an analogy argument, it will be interviewed that person can use the same argument for the speaker instead, it will be called a tu quoque argument ... as thought so, the tu quoque argument Is a fairly broad category that includes other types of parameters and ad synonym parameters. "

"Even a strong urge to say" I told you "in all human instincts is not more intense than the reaction called tu quoque. 'Cathy said you took her chocolate,' Yes, but she stole my doll '), we do not grow it.

"France demanded pressure on Myanmar's military regime through the Security Council and through the European Union, and the Foreign Minister discussed this issue yesterday.

As part of the push, it tried to fight without hoping to be regarded as criticizing the internal affairs of others, due to stubborn Russia, probably Chechen's consciousness. Therefore, the response of the Russian Minister is that he will submit a problem to the United Nations the next time a riot occurs in France.

"This reaction is childish, irrelevant and may be very satisfying," (Geoffrey Wheatcroft, The Guardian, 16th October 2007)

Osama bin Laden 's answer is not a good example. It is because he is insensitive to this problem directly. He revealed that certain forms of "military training camp" and "warrior" would be implicitly equivalent to "terrorism" in other forms of mistakes. One convenient way of not delaying this is to point out the similarities between the critic's activities (the United States of America) and the activities he is asking. In order to mark "terror" rather than another thing, he believes this is paradoxical on its own. Therefore, the answer to the question already suggests the range of possible answers. Osama bin Laden said: This question is assumed and not responsible (this is a complicated problem). In your case it is not.

Perfectly speaking, "tu quoque" is a logical mistake, this is a specific case of advertising. The truth of the facts is not dependent on who talks, what they talk about, and the action they have taken in the past. However, although this is a logical error, it does not invalidate the presented argument, but it is still a very useful technique. If it is true that "you do it" is actually true, we can weigh what is being said to be more cautious. Therefore, due to this horrible aspect of Robert Reich, Duquaq is indeed the correct answer:

In general, the attraction of hypocrisy is very tough for me. Tu quoque ("you are are") is an informal logical mistake that attempts to misidentify the validity of the partner's logical argument by arguing that he did not act according to his conclusion. This is a paradox because the other's behavior (reflecting the moral qualities of the other) is irrelevant to the internal logic of the partner's assertion and the "correctness" of the partner's conclusion. This is an advertisement