TS Eliot paper

"Where is the lost lost in our life, where are the wisdom we lost in our knowledge? Where are the knowledge we lost in the information?" And change the world A poet who wants to. His hope is that it gives real society a realistic check, encourages them to change themselves and make their lives more valuable. TS Eliot wants to change his society through alienation, isolation, and examples of society that collapses.

However, before proceeding this way, we found TS Eliot, the most outstanding critic and practitioner, walking along our path. In his famous 1919 paper "Traditional and Personal Skills", Elliot destroyed personal consciousness, personality, and personal thoughts in his writings. He insists that there is little such thing, nothing interesting about it. For Elliot the most unique and successful aspect of the writer's work is the place where his literary ancestors strongly insist on their immortality. Poetry and his personality are irrelevant poetry is all I can understand poetry only through glasses of literary history history. That article is a style written in such a higher church and has such authoritarian authority, even if your emotional experience as your writer is completely opposite, you can use it I will be forced to believe.

TS Eliot wrote an essay with Essay Hamlet in 1920 and tried to redefine how critics see literary works. At the beginning of his article, Elliot argued that critics tried important insights by insisting that critics "extend his Shakespeare using his Hamlet" to expand interpretation of their own drama It failed to clarify that it failed. (1) Previous critics such as Coleridge and Goethe did not regard Hamlet as a drama, but instead focused on Hamlet and easily recognized its role. The main argument is that, in fact, as a work of art, drama Hamlet completely failed. To prove this, Elliot invented an unprecedented standard, objective relationship. For example, the writer will show the audience a fuss, itch, a bad scream outside the house, and the audience will feel afraid when the hero is afraid.

British essayist TS Eliot thinks Hamlet has a problem that Shakespeare is hardly recognizable - Elliot can hardly mention - and it ruined the drama. Perhaps it is a male crisis that men can not act? Hamlet often explains himself as a man or a woman, not a man. Shake Spear did not act, so it was castrated, it was not clear any more. Near the end of the game, Hamlet again compared his question about the next battle with Ruthes as a woman: "This is just a foolish act, but it may make women feel trouble" .