truthfulness

Behavior and speech are genuine, it is extremely important for character integrity.

People behind the truth are different. People after the truth do not say that there is no objective truth. People after the truth say there is an objective truth, but my opinion and my preference are more important. It is wonderful if these truths are consistent with my opinion. But otherwise, I do not mind. You see the problem: In my opinion, you can not really make a logical dialogue with the real people, and their preference is more important. Why is our preference, view, emotion more important than facts that can actually be verified? Why are we there? In order to deal with this situation and find hope, I think that we have to actually diagnose how we arrived here and how to deal with it. Diagnosis is not a happy diagnosis now. Not really

The truth (upper case "T") is a secondary meaning of the word "truth", but I think that it is not used properly because it is irrelevant to the main meaning. This "truth" actually means spiritual light and deep emotion. Because this phenomenon can not be verified, "lighting" or "depth" is more appropriate than "truth". God continues to give inspiration today. If we have ears to listen to, we may all be the recipients of this gift. We do not have to rely on the ancient Bible. They can offer valuable courses, but we should not be too serious about the intellectual treatment of undoubted or religious stories. We should not consider spiritual experiences of others as a substitute for the moment we spent this life.

4 Either way, the truth is objective. Adding 'objectively' to 'realistic' indicates that there are no other possible facts. There may be subjective emotions, experiences and phenomena, but there is no subjective truth. In my opinion, as part of occupational ethics, whether criticism of philosophy is moral or moral is so. 5 Wittgenstein, Ludwig, "Moral Lecture", Philosophical Review 74 (1965): 11-12, and the last sentence of Wittgenstein, Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, London: K. Paul, 5) See. As Arto Tukiainen stated, "Wittgenstein considers the idea of" philosophical philosophy "to be moral, his purpose is to show that there is no meaningful meaning.The moral judgment "Therefore, Wittgenstein should deny that morality is objective. See http://examinedlifejournal.com/articles/printerfriendly.php?shorttitle=wittmoralval&authorid=54.