Truth Essay

For decades, the issue of right and wrong has been debated. Many conservatives still believe that the truth is absolute, but the other conservatives oppose and the truth is said to be relative. I believe the truth is a view on individual beliefs and decision-making.

For this reason, the truth distinguishes individuals by contrasting their perspectives. But the truth is that everyone think that is right. Therefore, it depends greatly on the real situation of people's mind. On the contrary, the truth spoken by malice is thought to be worse than a lie. Therefore, the truth is an expression, symbol, statement that corresponds to reality and happiness.

Nonetheless, I also believe that the truth is absolute, so it is not right to do the wrong thing. The truth is the purity of right and wrong. Whatever we believe and think, "absolute truth" is correct. Absolute truth exists independently. In a sense, the absolute truth is absolutely right whether it is any evidence. The truth corresponds to the facts. Because I understand, the truth does not change

In addition, speaking the truth is not necessarily a good thing. If the purpose of telling the truth is to hurt someone, then it is considered less then the worst lie. So, when you tell the truth, you should remember that it does not hurt others' feelings and relationships. The problem we face is that when I see it, we feel the urge to tell the truth. But we should try to accomplish this without opposed accusations of hurting others. So, if we can freely talk about strict judgment about other people, we are actually talking about the negative nature that causes the biggest problem.

Likewise, it should be noted that the self-satisfied truth does not harm others's lives. Likewise, sometimes lying, if it brings happiness to others, you should always keep in mind that it is also beneficial. Thus, if the purpose of telling the truth is to destroy something or someone else

It is not accessible unless there is no problem in the truth. Furthermore, speaking the truth is undoubtedly a political act. Hannah Arendt declares in her article "Truth and Politics" as follows. "From a political standpoint, the truth is authoritarian." "An unwelcome opinion can be asserted, rejected or compromised." "But unpopular facts have frustrating stubbornness and nothing can move except for ordinary lies." Furthermore, in the latter part of the 20th century, social justice is That is not possible. This is a lesson from the transformation of the Czech playwright Vaclav Havel to a politician and I teach it to everyone. In a classic paper "power of helplessness" about the role of intellectuals in the fight against totalitarian, he stated as follows. A place of hidden life, it hides the openness to the truth. "

A new judicial system based on mediation was discovered in the second half of the 20th century. The Truth and Reconciliation Committee is an alternative to providing a potentially powerful truth and settlement, not a strict and formal judicial judge. These things are considered to be similar to justice. Internationally, there are currently more than 20 truth committees, the latest of which was held in East Timor. The truth committee deviated completely from the early judicial system like the war criminal court. In the increasingly globalized judicial economy, the truth committee is often positioned as an alternative to the trial. However, it is important to emphasize that in most political contexts where truth missions occur, the possibility of future (or concurrent) trials will not be ruled out.

Storytelling: Kirsty Sangster's justice and recognition in narration of suffering people