Trump suggested the anonymous op-ed article could be 'treason.' Is he right?

Washington - President Donald Trump, asking if anyone who is writing an anonymous column on the New York Times committed treason

This is easy: No. This is not a criminal act, but it is not treason.

House minority leader Dancy Calosi mocked Trump on Thursday and said that his rebellion was "the appearance of his instability."

Rebellion is the only sin prescribed in the constitution, including the initiation of war against the United States, enemy 's "handling", "aid and comfort". The Constitution does not prescribe punishment, but federal law prescribes - from prison until five years of death

"Enemy" refers to a country or organization that is in warfare state declaring war or opening to the United States. "Aid and comfort" is not encouraging, it must be important. The column did not pass these two tests

For example, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg were convicted in 1953 after they were convicted of secretly passing an American atomic bomb to a Soviet spy.

Nobody has been convicted of treason in the United States for 66 years. The last few cases involved helping Americans in Germany and Japan during the Second World War.

On the weekend, another voice reflected anonymous articles for cards. It shocked American politics. Michael Moore argued that there is a secret "resistance" behind the trump staff, answering the "New York Times" column, he reveals what he thought was the man behind the job Did. The film director pointed out the command of the White House frankly. Mr. Moore said he believed that the president ordered the White House staff to write this article if Mr. Trump does not directly support this column. "He is the main interferer," Moore told CNN. "He is the king of false alarms, if we learn something right now, that's what he did to turn people around."

Who wrote an anonymous column against President Cardo on Wednesday at the New York Times? All we know is what the Times revealed: it is "a senior official in the Trump regime". However, according to the content and style of the column, the most likely author is the US Ambassador to Russian Ambassador John. Huntsman is clearly suspected for several reasons. The theme of this article is the classic Huntsman. Passion for conservative policy, frank opinion for low level people. In 2016, he submitted the same view to the cards. The theme of getting the most space and detail is Huntsman, the current region of Russia. (As Slate's Fred Kaplan pointed out, Trump has destroyed by avoiding Huntsman.) Prose is a wonderful editorial, like Huntsman's speech and interview. Like Huntsman, this condition is very religious. In line with the letter from July's Huntsman to Salt Lake Tribune, motivation to the article that "Americans should know that there is an adult in the room"