Trial by Jury withing the English Legal System

In the British legal system, our UK legal system jury trial, the jury has been established for centuries. It stands for public sections and consists of 12 non-experts. They listened to both sides of the example and gave their verdict based on the submitted facts. Some people think the jury is independent, so it will not be affected by the government, I think the jury trial is better than the fair judge. Criminal cases In the criminal court, 12 juries were indicted for crime.

In the British legal system the role of the jury is still part of the controversial justice system. Jury selected election complications; test cost and living, experience and wisdom The jury was summoned to the judges. B) especially underestimated ethnic minorities, coming from different backgrounds, c) juries who have a lot of reasons to prove the lack of complex intelligence and experience necessary to make a fair judgment at the jury trial The appointment and trial time is personal, too long The length of time can not address the need to rethink the whole process of the jury trial. Some previous juries can not judge whether they are not, because they know little about the law, they show that there is no clear explanation, but negative comments by the jury Tend to use, and ignore many other evidence,

In the traditional legal system based on English, the jury survey of facts and conclusion of the jury can get a jury to support fact finding, decision making is not clear, Despite having the right to appeal greatly, certain de facto respect. Under other legal systems, the Court of Appeals usually can reconsider the fact findings and conclusions of the Court of First Instance court, and in these systems the evidence is appealed to the Court of Appeals by a de novo fact-finding (new) appeal of the hearing I will submit the same thing as the trial. With the ultimate tradition of the fact that the English legal system, the trial court of the first instance has a significant impact on the trial proceedings in these systems. This is because the evidence submitted to the jury with trial errors and errors in a ruling can not usually be appealed to fix, so the attorney is fully based on the traditional court system, especially in the UK, We need to be prepared for