Transnational Networks of Support for the Zapatista Rebellion

The term globalization, which supports Zapatista's rebellion, is used to describe the major framework of the international relations after the Cold War and affects many aspects of political and social experience. It is seen in the rebellion and movement of Zapatista in the state of Chiapas in Mexico, benefiting from globalization and cross-border support. In this article, we will examine the relationship between transnationalism and social movement, taking Zapatista as an example.

In this study we investigated the origin and nature of the Zapatista rebellion in Chiapas, the reaction of the Mexican government and the military, the impact on the military relations and the future of Mexico. It put the army 's response in the context of the resonance of the institutional resonance of the transition to the country' s accelerated democracy, and analyzed the influence of democratization on the military. The main findings are as follows. • Unlike most traditional guerrilla movements, Zapata National Liberation Army (EZLN) is trying to force democracy open, not to destroy the country or control power. In this respect, it is at least partially successful. Indeed, compared to the dramatic economic reforms of the Salinas government over the past few years, Zapatista may have done more to speed up the process of democratization in Mexico.

Surprisingly, this non-growing catalyst is more important than indigenous Zapatista rebellion in Chiapas in southern Mexico, and extensive political mobilization it contributes. The computer network that supports the revolt has evolved from the familiar traditional solidarity tool (eg material aid and human rights protection and Salinas and Zediro government policy) to electronic structure for many people. Broader policies Today these networks provide an increasingly global challenge to the dominant economic policy at this time of the year, and in the process, distinguish domestic policy and foreign policy, I am confusing even the constitution of the current nation state. This extremism will spread to that extent and the most prudent review is necessary.