Trafficking in Human Beings for the Purpose of Organ Removal...

Doctors and other health care professionals seem to possess the ability to play a role in monitoring, probably from the perspective of reducing trafficking for organ removal. They are important information sources for patients and have access to information that can be used to better understand the organ transport network. However, the recognized legal and ethical obligations of their patients may create difficult policy tensions that makes it difficult to implement policy measures at the physician / patient level. This article describes the role of the physician in three key phases of dialogue with patients (legal and ethical obligations). Information stage, pre-transplant stage, and post-transplant stage. While policy challenges still exist, doctors still openly play an important role by publicly disclosing the risks and dangers associated with illegal organ transplantation and sincerely stating the doctor's own moral objections can do. They can also report colleagues involved in illegal trade to appropriate regulatory bodies. Due to existing legal and ethical obligations, doctors may be prohibited from reporting patients who received illegal organs. But given the potential benefits of collecting more information on illegal trade, this is the area in which legal revision should be considered.

Source of funding: This report was released under the auspices of the European Commission - Ministry of the Interior crime prevention measures and crime prevention plan.

Timothy Caulfield led the group's discussion, wrote the first draft of the article, and integrated co-authors' comments. W. D. discussed the group and participated in the writing of the article. I participated in discussion of M. B. group and commented on draft. I know that. I participated in the discussion of the group and commented on the draft. I know that. I participated in the discussion of the group and commented on the draft. G. D. participated in the discussion of the group and commented on the draft. J.G. participated in the group's discussion and / or commented on the draft. I participated in discussion of the group and commented on the draft. I joined the group's discussion and commented on the draft

Communication: Timothy Colefield, Health Law Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. (Caulfield@ualberta.ca)

This is an open access article distributed under the conditions of Creative Commons display - Non-Profit - No Derivative License 0 (CCBY - NC - ND). This work can not be changed in any way or used commercially.

Multinational organizations Crime groups are involved in trafficking to eliminate organs and organs themselves. Human trafficking protocol complementing the International Organized Crime Treaty includes trafficking for organs removal. The Working Party recommends that Parties to the Convention encourage relevant UN agencies, including UNODC, to collect evidence on trafficking to eliminate organs, including root causes, trends and working methods. Recognizing this phenomenon while recognizing the difference in transport in organs, tissues, and cells

Doctors and other health care professionals seem to possess the ability to play a role in monitoring, probably from the perspective of reducing trafficking for organ removal. They are important information sources for patients and have access to information that can be used to better understand the organ transport network. However, the recognized legal and ethical obligations of their patients may create difficult policy tensions that makes it difficult to implement policy measures at the physician / patient level. This article describes the role of the physician in three key phases of dialogue with patients (legal and ethical obligations). Information stage, pre-transplant stage, and post-transplant stage. They can also report colleagues involved in illegal trade to appropriate regulatory bodies.