Tradition and the Individual Talent

Article written by T. S "Traditional and Personal" Elliott tells us that for many reasons the poets should withdraw from their work and draw out the personal elements they may want to add It shows to us. At the time of writing this it is difficult to create works that contain elements of previous ancestors and poets. Eliot talks about the theme of "tradition" (2544) and "can not succeed" (2544). And we need to build historical events and current events in order to create text rather than individual personality. replica

In his "role of criticism," Elliott directly addressed his "tradition" in his 1919 paper "tradition and personal talent." In the latter article he writes tradition as a way to see all cultures using literature. The classic works of European literature from Homer to the present constitute "simultaneously" and "the ideal order" between them. According to Elliott, whenever "a really new" literary work is produced today, this work is introduced in this ideal order, bringing "change" to existing works. Therefore, this view of the European literary tradition requires that "the past should be changed as it is now" (Elliot, "traditional" 4).

As I pointed out earlier, Elliott's classic literary form in 'wasteland' is the official interpretation of the literary tradition of Europe represented by 'tradition and individual talent'. Elliot himself is at the boundary of classicism of "wasteland". In the context of "tradition and individual talent", the meaning of "true new" art work in the "ideal order" of "European literary classics" is to make classical past works by modifying its contents I'll change it. Therefore, the classical form of Elliot shown in "wasteland" quoted from Asian literature is actually trying to incorporate non-European work into this ideal order. But, as I already indicated, making invasion of non-European works into European literary classics is meaningless.

Eliot began traditional and personal abilities as a treatment of the ability of poets to show their talents in the historical context of literature. This article asserts that poets should use their knowledge of past writers to influence their work. He pointed out, "We think that the most personal part of his work is the deceased poet, its ancestors, claiming their immortality most strongly." "News is better than repeating" He defines tradition as being obtained only by understanding what is obtained through past literature and existence. We are strictly aware of what technologies and content are worthwhile. The poet should go back to the classics and know the synchronization order of the literary tradition