Toward the Terror

The French Revolution began in 1789 with the aim of transforming France into a more free and equal society governed by a more constitutional monarchy. But by 1793, it completely created something else - a system of oppression and violence known as terrorism. While some claim that the climax of the revolution at this point is inevitable, some think that an important event between 1789 and 1793 put the revolution on this specific orbit. In the face of the latter, I think that the attempt by King Louis XVI who tried to escape in 1791 was a very important turning point of the revolution.

The concepts and concepts of terrorism, for at least the United States, were made almost in the 20th century. Why does such a century in the 20th century provide terrorism to the United States? Bridget L. Nacos' book "Terrorism and the Media" details in detail how terrorism works in our society. Japan is a major country in the world and this is the role played by terrorism. Nakos says that there are various kinds of terrorism and there are various types of perpetrators. Nakos focuses on innocent Americans who do not have a high position. One of the important points that Nacos reminds us is that the general opposition is generally not the dissatisfaction of the perpetrator, but the means they use. This book is aimed at showing the relationship between terrorism and the media and how it prospers in the media.

One of the main obstacles to determining terrorism is that terrorism in al Qaeda is a moral problem. Therefore, this is one of the main reasons why it is difficult to define terrorism. Attempts to define the term "terror" are often based on the assumption that certain types of political violence are reasonable and others are unreasonable. Many people call the latter terrorism and reluctant to condemn the former with words that are often used as words. Therefore, in order for the definition to be universally accepted, it must exceed the description of behavior to include personal motives, social environments, and political goals (Wardlaw 1989: 4). Therefore, depending on these other factors, a particular observer will consider or regard this behavior as terrorism. Therefore, many terrorist scholars think that it is difficult to mark an event as "terrorist" unless it makes a moral judgment about behavior.