Torture under the Bush Adminstration

After the September 11 terrorist attack, the US announced the war against terrorists. The US president wants to retaliate against the Al - Queada organization that is in charge of the attack. As a result, soldiers were sent to Iraq and Afghanistan to find them. They suspected that the people threatening the country were detained by the US military in order to investigate whether there was even more terrorist attacks against the United States. Some suspects were sent to a more rigorous prison such as Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib for interrogation.

When George W. Bush and Dick Cheney began their eternal war under the flag of the "world-scale terrorist war", they began an unidentified tactical trinity. Torture, abduction, and indefinite detention were the orders of the day. After Obama 's policies interrupt these policies, they seem to be ready to revive now. Eight years after President Obama 's decision, despite his tendency to withdraw from the "war with terror" and express the war of his country more vaguely that "like Islamic states" devastated and destroyed " Nevertheless, the eternal war of the country continues. A violent jihad player. Nonetheless, he paid great effort to stop the breach of US and international law during the Bush era and signed an enforcement order on the day of his inauguration in 2009.

Just before the end of Bush's second phase in 2009, the news media from other countries outside the United States began to publicize the views of prisoner abuse under the United Nations Convention against Torture. Penal Code Supporters of this view pointed to the United Nations Special Report on the torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, which George presided on January 20, 2009, on the German television as follows He is a Manfred Nowak professor. W. President Bush will lose its state immunity and under the international law the United States will be empowered to file criminal proceedings against all those involved in these UN torture treaties violations. Law professor Dietmar Herz explained that under US and international law Novak's comment suggests that former President Bush is criminally responsible for using torture as a tool of interrogation .

When accompanying the treaty ratified by the Senate, international law has the powers of the law of the United States. This is the reason why President Bush and his company can not be tortured. According to national law and international law, they commit a crime including torture. However, domestic law requires Congress to approve war. By abandoning this law, Obama may commit a murder. If the drone attack is not a constitutional war act, what are these actions? Who is positioned? why? I do not know, there is no parliament. This situation is unconstitutional