Top articles in 2017: Frontiers in Psychology

In 2017, the world's most interdisciplinary psychology journal was even more successful and the impact factor was 323.

A warm welcome to 918 new editors who joined the editorial committee in 2017. This year I published 10,000 articles, but the number of new articles has increased by more than 20% - the reputation of journals continues to rise

Thanks to our editors, critics, and critics on these wonderful achievements, we are hoping for continued cooperation in 2018.

Please look for some of the most popular surveys in 2017, including the latest survey results, the effects of video games, the impact of various educational methods, and the latest findings on neurological sustainability.

One of the top ten remaining in the final selection of the 2017 Spotlight Awards was also announced at the forefront of psychology.

Eliminate myths: Education and neuroscience training reduces beliefs in neurology but does not eliminate

Lack of evidence that neuropathic responses are compromised in overuse of violent video games: fMRI study

Mathematical Anxiety and Statistical Anxiety A shared shared but unshared component and a hostile contribution to statistical performance

Gender approach: how mathematical ability belief affects choice in secondary and higher education and degree

Make perfect self photos: the influence of the viewpoint of the survey on perception of higher cognitive variables

Different team, the same conclusion? A systematic review of existing clinical guidelines for tinnitus assessment and treatment of adults

Smartphone and cognition: Review of research on the relationship between mobile technology habits and cognitive functions

Articles published in the Comparative Psychology section will benefit from the frontier impact and hierarchical system after online publication. As the author of the original study of the most influential publication judged by the reader, he will be invited by the editor to write articles on cutting edge comments. We call this "democratic stratification". The authors chose the impact analysis of articles based on original research published in all Frontiers' specialized journals and sections. The main comments focus on the first discovery and place them in a wider context to address the broader community problem in all psychology

Frontiers, an open publisher in Switzerland, recently collaborated with the Nature Publishing Group and expanded the researcher-led open science platform. State-of-the-art articles are strictly peer-reviewed and can be freely disseminated widely by colleagues and a wider research community. LinkedIn's Damage Mechanism Group (360+ members) - Hydrogen Crisp Group is a forum for discussing all aspects of engineering material damage and destruction (traditional materials and advanced materials). It also describes the destructive mechanism, predictability and mitigation / precautionary measures, ► material behavior, degradation, aging, damage and lifespan evaluation, modeling and analysis of damage, destruction and destruction, ► crack and crack initiation and propagation, ► Material engineering, ► characterization of materials, ► analysis of root causes, and ► forensic engineering

Lia Boroditsky, professor of psychology at Stanford University and Editor in Cultural Psychology, presents some interesting examples in a recent Wall Street Journal article. In Russian there is a further difference between bright blue and dark blue, but in the test, Russians can visually distinguish the blue shadows than those who speak other languages. There are no numbers (such as 10 or 100) in Brazilian Piraha languages, but since there are few terms there is no word to track accurate amounts.